That’s the headline on this story from the Associated Press and it pisses me off. Not because it’s incorrect, it’s not. But because at best it’s lazy and spins information in such a way that doesn’t represent what the the information the story has to tell. If I were on the copy desk I would have written the headline this way:
ISRAEL FACES FLOOD OF DARFURIAN REFUGEES FROM EGYPT.
That better tells the story that you find in the lede of copy.
Israel said Sunday it will no longer allow refugees from Darfur to stay after they sneak across the border from Egypt, drawing criticism from those who say the Jewish state is morally obliged to offer sanctuary to people fleeing mass murder.
Israel has been grappling for months over how to deal with the swelling numbers of Africans, including some from Darfur, who have been crossing the porous desert border.
Notice that the original head says nothing about Egypt’s moral obligation to offer sanctuary to people fleeing mass murder, even though the Darfurians have traversed more than 750 kilometers of Egyptian soil to reach the Israeli border.
And where are these rejected refugges being sent? Back to Darfur to be slaughtered? No, back to Egypt which allowed them to travel from Sudan to Israel.
On Sunday, a government spokesman said some 500 Darfurians already in Israel would be allowed to stay, but all new asylum seekers would be sent back to Egypt, with no exception.
“The policy of returning back anyone who enters Israel illegally will pertain to everyone, including those from Darfur,” spokesman David Baker said.
Overnight, Israel returned 48 Africans to Egypt. An Israeli government official said Egypt had guaranteed that any Darfur refugees would not be forced to return to Sudan. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release that information to the press.
No country is capable of absorbing an unlimited influx of immigrants. Look at how states surrounding Iraq are dealing with refugees attempting to escape the civil war in that country.
At best the AP copy desk is guilty of inept or lazy writing. At worst it’s a blatant attempt at discrimination.