I stopped in at Target yesterday and there saw a large display of unnoticed and unpurchased copies of Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows. Unnoticed except by a 10-year-old-or-so boy reading the last chapter. He will grow up to be irritable, restless and fidgety, aggressive, and generally not self-controlled.
Or so suggests Juliet Lapidos.
When a few media outlets published early reviews of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows this week, author J.K. Rowling protested that the articles contained spoilers. She declared herself “staggered that American newspapers have decided to … [ignore] the wishes of literally millions of readers, particularly children, who wanted to reach Harry’s final destination by themselves, in their own time.”
Presumably, Rowling assumes that half the pleasure of reading a fat, event-filled tome lays in our uncertainty about how it will end. But not every boy-wizard devotee thrives on guesswork and anticipation. According to a poll of 500 children taken for the British bookstore chain Waterstone’s, nearly one-fifth of Harry Potter fans will skip straight to the end of the final book in the series. Is there something wrong with sussing out an ending in advance?
Not if it’s something important.
And the problem is, I think, we’re not teaching our children how to tell the difference.
In a culture where it’s the destination, not the journey, that’s important, skipping to the end seems like a perfectly logical strategy. If you get an A+ on your history quiz, no one really checks to see if you actually read the text. If you graduate from high school with a 4.4 grade point average, the colleges you apply to never check with your teachers to see what kind of student you were. And if you show a net return on investment of 32 percent for the last fiscal year, your stockholders don’t check to see how you pulled off that miracle.
Part of me wants to blame the President Dwight Eisenhower and the International Highway system. When I was growing up we took family vacations and traveled state roads to get to places like Gettysburg. Then in the late ’60s Interstate 77 plowed through Marietta and vacations changed.
We went further quicker and it was all about are we there yet?
On Friday morning I listened to The Sound of Ideas on WCPN and one of the people being interviewed made a comment about just doing things to make the day go faster. How desperate, how horrible must your life be to wish to make it pass faster? What is so attractive about death that we want to get there, everyone’s ultimate destination, as fast as possible?
I finished reading Robert R McCammon’s Boy’s Life a few days ago. Not a great book but an enjoyable lazy read with enough surprises in it to make its reading a worthwhile endeavor. One of the sub-themes in the story is the importance of the time between the beginning and end of summer.
When you’re twelve you want each day of summer to stretch to an eternity. You fill each moment with an intensity of living very few of us manage to carry over into adulthood. There are a few. I think Warren Zevon was thinking about this when he wrote I’ll Sleep When I’m Dead. (Zevon, of course, provided a marvelous living example with the album he produced in the final weeks before he died of cancer in 2003.)
I do understand the desperation that leads people to live in anticipation of each Friday. I get how we lean into the future.
The future doesn’t exist, however. And neither does the past. There is only now. The rest is illusion.
I’ve Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows on reserve at the library. It’s in for me and I’ll probably stop by tomorrow to pick it up. I’m looking forward to an enjoyable read.