I’m pro-draft because I think that a citizen military is one of the strongest supports any democracy can have. In his classic juvenile science fiction novel, Star Ship Troopers, Robert Heinlein posits a world where military service is tied to the franchise, the right to vote. Military service is not mandatory, but only veterans (not active-duty personnel) are allowed to vote. Such a system, I think, serves two purposes.
First, it guarantees that every parent has a direct interest in any government decision that places our military forces in harm’s way. Second, it underscores the fact that our freedom is earned, not given. I think you tend to take things like Liberty more seriously when you’ve worked for it.
(Full disclosure: I voluntarily served five years in the U.S. Navy and six years in the Ohio Army National Guard.)
I’m writing about this today because of three pieces I found originating from Hollow Army: Parents Kill Recruitment at Daily KOS. The first is Damien Cave’s Growing Problem For Military Recruiters: Parents from the New York Times. The second is this military memo from Slate. And, the third is Fifteen Months, Try Eight Years Instead by Chad Miles at Soldiers For The Truth.
Cave tells us in his piece that:
A Department of Defense survey last November, the latest, shows that only 25 percent of parents would recommend military service to their children, down from 42 percent in August 2003.
“Parents,” said one recruiter in Ohio who insisted on anonymity because the Army ordered all recruiters not to talk to reporters, “are the biggest hurdle we face.”
Legally, there is little a parent can do to prevent a child over 18 from enlisting. But in interviews, recruiters said that it was very hard to sign up a young man or woman over the strong objections of a parent.
The Pentagon – faced with using only volunteers during a sustained conflict, an effort rarely tried in American history – is especially vexed by a generation of more activist parents who have no qualms about projecting their own views onto their children.
The recruiting obstacles are serious enough that now commanders are being told to think carefully before discharging sub-standard personnel. In a 5 May memo from the Bureau of Military Personnel in Washington, commanding officers that: (I apologize for the all caps. I’m just to lazy to retype the memo. JH)
3. WE ARE AN ARMY AT WAR AND INCREASING LEVELS OF ATTRITION OF FIRST-TERM ENLISTED SOLDIERS IN BOTH THE TRAINING BASE AND UNITS IS A MATTER OF GREAT CONCERN. WE NEED YOUR CONCERTED EFFORT TO REVERSE THE RECENT NEGATIVE TREND IN FIRST-TERM ATTRITION.
BY REDUCING ATTRITION ONE PERCENT, THE ARMY CAN SAVE UP TO 3,000 INITIAL-TERM SOLDIERS THAT’S 3,000 MORE SOLDIERS IN OUR FORMATIONS. EACH SOLDIER RETAINED REDUCES THE STRAIN ON RECRUITING COMMAND AND OUR RETENTION PROGRAM, WHICH MUST REPLACE EVERY SOLDIER WHO DEPARTS THE ARMY EARLY.
4. AS AN ADDITIONAL MEANS OF REDUCING ATTRITION, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY SEPARATION AUTHORITY FOR FIRST-TERM ENLISTED SOLDIERS IS ELEVATED FROM THE BATTALION COMMANDER TO THE SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL CONVENING AUTHORITY (SPCMCA) FOR THE FOLLOWING SEPARATION CATEGORIES PRESCRIBED BY AR 635-200:
FAILURE TO MEET PROCUREMENT MEDICAL FITNESS STANDARDS (PARAGRAPH 5-11); PREGNANCY (CHAPTER EIGHT); ALCOHOL OR OTHER DRUG ABUSE REHABILITATION FAILURE (CHAPTER 9); ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT (CHAPTER 11);
UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE (CHAPTER 13); SELECTED CHANGES IN SERVICE OBLIGATIONS (CHAPTER 16, PARAGRAPHS 16-4 THRU 16-10); AND FAILURE TO MEET BODY FAT STANDARDS (CHAPTER 18).
WITHHOLDING OF SEPARATION AUTHORITY FROM BATTALION COMMANDERS, AND ELEVATING IT TO SPCMCA LEVEL, IS DIRECTED BY HQDA PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 1-19E, AR 635-200. SEPARATION AUTHORITY FOR CHAPTERS 5, 10, 14, AND 15 REMAIN AT THE SPCMA LEVEL.
And, in a classic case of recruiter bait-and-switch, Miles details how recruiters are getting young men and women who don’t read the fine print to commit to eight-years of service. Writes Miles:
As with most things, the Devil is in the details. The option is only available for 59 of the 150 military occupational specialties (MOS) offered by the Army. Basic training and advanced individual training (AIT) do not count toward the fifteen months of active-duty time.
For example, an enlistment as an Infantryman (MOS 11B) would add an additional eight weeks for basic training and another thirteen week for AIT, bringing the total active duty commitment to nearly 18 months.
Training for more technically oriented jobs can take even longer. AIT for an Intelligence Analyst (MOS 96B) is roughly four months long. Making the “fifteen-month” enlistment more like twenty months.
So after basic training, AIT and your fifteen months on active duty, you’re done, right? No, not exactly.
After active duty there is a mandatory two-year commitment in the National Guard or in the Army Reserve. The chances of being called back to active duty would probably be pretty high during this time considering the reliance on the Guard and Reserve in Iraq.
OK, so I have done my fifteen months-plus on active duty, I have done my two years in the Guard, now am I done, right? Well actually, no.
You see, the overall obligation is for eight years, so you would spend the remainder of your time in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and be subject to recall to active duty (which has been happening with more frequency lately).
This is not a good time to be a parent. I have an 18-year-old nephew who is a terrific kid with a great future ahead of him. I know that his mother and father are rightly worried about what may happen to him. I worry about what may happen to him.
All the more reason for all of us to stay informed, stay involved and rage against the machine.
My Soundtrack: I Love Rock ‘N’ Roll by Joan Jett And The Blackhearts.