I love it when people who preach get caught with their hand in the cookie jar and then attempt to justify their actions by exclaiming: But you did it too! That’s the tack being taken by the sycophants of President George Bush. Except, like their tarnished hero, they’re choosing to shave the truth and outright lie to make their point.
Writes Joe Conason:
In his signature style, Drudge has sought to suggest that Bush has done nothing that Democratic presidents didn’t do, which may reflect his own continuing obsession with Bill Clinton. The Internet gossip’s headline this week blared, Clinton Executive Order: Secret Search on Americans Without Court Order…
He went on to link to a National Review Online article that made much of a Clinton order in 1994 authorizing warrantless searches. But it is important to connect the dots, as the president would say, in Drudge’s ellipsis points.
The Clinton executive order permitted such searches only under certain very limited circumstances that are legal under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the very statute that Bush has admitted ignoring.
The Center for American Progress noted Wednesday what Drudge left out and what the National Review’s Byron York elided — namely, the difference between search or surveillance operations conducted against foreigners and those conducted against American citizens.
(Some people, York later noted in chiding exaggerations on both sides of the issue, have said that Bill Clinton signed an executive order authorizing such surveillance; he did not.)
The reason for all the scrambling, of course, is the danger that someone in Congress may discover a conscience and decide that a president who shreds the law might not be the kind of president that is good for the United States. Such an attitude might lead to gasp impeachment hearings.
Writes Michele Goldberg:
It may be exceedingly unlikely that President Bush will be impeached, but in the past few days, the I-word has become a topic of considered discussion among constitutional scholars, former intelligence officers and even a few politicians.
If you listen carefully, you can hear the word impeachment, curmudgeonly commentator Jack Cafferty said on CNN. Two congressional Democrats are using it. And they’re not the only ones.
Indeed, speaking on the Diane Rehm show on public radio, Norman Ornstein, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said, I think if we’re going to be intellectually honest here, this really is the kind of thing that Alexander Hamilton was referring to when impeachment was discussed.
Could the Jack Bauer defense be failing?
My Soundtrack: Disappearing Act by Grizzly Bear on WOXY.