
For Mike, see Comment No. 5 below.

There has been more buzz of late attempting to help America’s chickenhawks dodge yet a few more bullets by pointing fingers at liberal icons who did not serve in our country’s armed forces during time of war. The latest crop of
waggling digits point to Virginian patriot and politician Patrick Henry.
Henry became a target after blogger Markos Moulitsas invoked him in an attack on Neo/Theocons in which he wrote: These blowhards pretend they are macho even as they piddle on themselves in abject terror from every boo! that comes out of Osama Bin Laden’s mouth.
Back in November when I posted about U.S. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), one of my readers took me to task for the use of the term Chickenhawk and wrote:
So our VP joins his fellow Chickenhawks Abe Lincoln (3 months in the Illinois militia, did not see combat in Chief Black Hawk”s Rebellion), Thomas Jefferson (In spite of his accomplishments, he did not take up arms during our Revolution.), and FDR (He contracted polio in 1921, so is a WWI Chickenhawk).
To that list of names I’ll add Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Henry from the comments to Captain Ed Morrissey’s post. None of these men meet my standard for the label Chickenhawk. And what is my standard?
A chickenhawk is an individual who made use of personal or family influence and wealth to avoid personal danger during the Vietnam War, but who now advocates the aggressive use of our country’s military might.
Why do I single out the period of the Vietnam War? The draft. The draft changes everything. When service is a choice, the chickenhawk label is meaningless.
For the record, I did not then and do not now think the Vietnam War was a just war and in the best interests of the United States. While I am technically a Vietnam-era veteran, I did not serve in the war and the last Vietnam Era draft came months before my 18th birthday. Yet I enlisted in 1974 and served in the Navy and the Ohio Army National Guard until 1986.
What then about the attempt to drape the chickenhawk label on Franklin, Adams, Henry, Jefferson, Lincoln and Roosevelt?
Franklin was born in 1706 and was 70 years old in 1776. He was a most unlikely candidate for military service in the American Revolution.
Adams was born in 1735, Henry a year later and Jefferson in 1743. That made them 41, 40 and 33 years old, respectively, in 1776. Not too old for service, but all three were established political leaders and arguably better served our fledgling nation in that role than they might have as military commanders.
Lincoln was born in 1809 and enlisted twice in our military in 1832 when he was 23. He first enlisted during the Black Hawk war and was elected Captain of his rifle company. He re-enlisted as a private after the company was disbanded. He served a total of three months but did not fight in a battle.
Finally, Roosevelt was born in 1882 and was 17 in 1898 when his older cousin volunteered for service in the Spanish American War. By 1917, when we entered the Great War — later renamed World War I — Roosevelt was 35 and already serving as Secretary of the Navy in President Woodrow Wilson’s administration.
Of the candidates, Roosevelt comes the closest because he did not follow cousin Teddy up San Juan hill, but since I’m not aware that he ever advocated an aggressive use of our military prior to the last declaration of war issued by Congress, I think the label slides away.
But compare, as Rep. Murtha did, the records of these patriots to that of Vice President Dick Cheney. No amount of talking points can keep the chickenhawk label from sticking to our Dick.
My Soundtrack: Neverending Math Equation by Sun Ki Moon on WOXY.