I’m a writer who aspires to join the rarified realm of poets. On its most basic level, poetry is what the poet says it is. But this is true of all art. And the chasm between art and Art is filled with the broken souls of those who leapt and fallen. So I read and learn from those who have crossed over to struggle with barriers I cannot imagine.
One of these is what Poet Sherry Chandler has come to call a pornography of atrocity.
Here is the core of Chandler’s exploration:
Still, what struck me in the piece was this passage:
There was no doubt in my mind that most of the poems I read were about the poets” real lives, offered up as performances, hoping to win a prize for the quality of their suffering, like the candidates on the old “Queen for a Day” show, who told their troubles to the genial host, and audience applause determined who would get the Amana Radar Range and the weekend at Lake Tahoe.
I wanted to sit the poets down in a classroom and lecture them: self-expression is not the point of it, people! We are not here on paper in order to retail our injuries. For one thing, it is unfair to bore someone who doesn”t have the opportunity to bore you right back, and for another, we have better things to do – to defend the hopeless and the down and out, to find humor in dreadful circumstances, to satirize the pompous and pretentious, to make deer appear suddenly in the driveway.
Writing is a blessed life, no matter how hard it may be at times, and a person is lucky to be a writer.
After my previous bloviating about Keillor, I”m embarrassed to find myself essentially in agreement with this statement. It cuts to the heart of a problem I”ve struggled with for a while.
How does one differentiate between what you might call a poetry of witness or even confessional poetry – how does one differentiate poetry from a sort of pornography of suffering. Americans have always loved their “Queen for a Day” type of schmaltz, but as Rochelle Gurstein says in her essay Mourning in America, “Being reduced to tears does not constitute an aesthetic experience.”
This question may reflect a sort of selfishness on my part. I”ve sat through many a poetry roundtable in which we were all reduced to tears several times. The experience evokes in me great sympathy but also a sort of despair. And, I blush to say, a little bit of boredom. As though my CD collection contained only Mahler.
When is it OK to say to the poet: “Get over yourself?”
My Soundtrack: Honeythief by Halou on WOXY.