19 November 2007

GOOD MORNING MYANMAR…

2030 by Jeff Hess

Regional partners with Myanmar are getting nervous about the sudden and unwelcome attention of Western citizens and government to their corner of Asia. Ahead of the Association of South East Asian Nations that convened Monday in Singapore, Laos and Cambodia called for the member states to stay out of each other’s internal affairs.

Lest their own activities enter the spotlight.

From Reuters:

Laos, a poor and landlocked communist state of 6.5 million people, has close political and economic ties with Myanmar. It was the first country Myanmar Prime Minister Thein Sein visited after his appointment last month.

“We denounce the imposition of sanctions or economic embargoes against Myanmar,” Lao Prime Minister Bouasone Bouphavanh told Reuters in an interview on Sunday ahead of an Association of South East Asian Nations summit.

Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen also rejected sanctions, ahead of a summit in Singapore on Tuesday where ASEAN leaders will sign a charter that calls for promotion of human rights.

“Economy sanctions are no good. They will not make the leaders of Myanmar die, but will lead to disaster for the civilian population. They are counter-productive,” Hun Sen said in reply to questions at a business forum.

Solid evidence, I think, that the sanctions are having an effect.

The United States expanded its sanctions against Myanmar’s rulers in October, when it added 11 more Myanmar military leaders to a list already facing sanctions, and tightened U.S. export controls to the country.

The tightening of the export controls included a ban on the sale of high-performance computers to Myanmar.

The European Union also agreed in October to strengthen sanctions against Myanmar that included visa bans and asset freezes on generals, an export ban on equipment to sectors involving timber, metals, minerals, semi-precious and precious stones plus import and investment bans on the sectors.

On Friday, the U.S. Senate voted unanimously to urge ASEAN to suspend Myanmar until the regime shows respect for human rights.

Now, if the Senate would just show equal backbone as regards Iraq.

19 November 2007

MUCKING OUT THE BLOGPILE…

1400 by Jeff Hess

I’m constantly tossing interesting websites into what I call my blogpile. Some of them find their way here in the form of regular posts, but more often than not they languish and get buried deeper in the pile. The end result is that I have to go back and do a bit of shoveling. Today’s item is Are Private High Schools Better Academically…?

19 November 2007

TORTURE AND TERRORISM ARE NOT EQUIVALENTS…

1327 by Jeff Hess

This afternoon I read a post by Andrew Sullivan in which he points to and quotes from an argument by Norm Geras that left-liberals can’t be against torture if they’re not willing to be equally against terrorism. What Geras doesn’t understand is that we are. Just not in the way I understand that he’d like to parse the meaning.

We are against the willful — intentional or not — targeting in time of war of children, women and non-combatants by all forces.

This is what Sullivan quoted:

Torture is an indefensible practice; but so is the random murder of innocents. The absence of pleas for understanding in the former case, set beside the rich presence of pleas for understanding in the latter case, tells either of a wildly imbalanced distribution of sociological curiosity with respect to the two or of a much greater predisposition on the British liberal-left to condone terrorism than to excuse torture.

And Sullivan responds:

It seems to me that both cross a profound moral line; and the most depressing fact of our time is that the right seems unable to refute torture without qualifications and the left seems unable to refute terrorism without qualifications. The key to civilization’s endurance, it seems to me, is a refusal to tolerate either.

On the face of his statement. I’m with him. But I doubt that he is willing to terrorism as I described it above.

Since sullivan doesn’t allow comments on the Daily Dish, I wrote him this email.

Shalom Andrew,

If only violence on the national scale could be settled using some form of the Marquess of Queensberry rules. If only armies could engage each other on sterile battlefields, far from productive farmland and civilian populations. If only the people who died in wars were adults who chose to take up arms and agreed that their life was more than an acceptable exchange for the liberty and freedom of those they fought to protect.

But that”s not the way we fight wars.

And that”s why Geras is wrong. Torture is not the equivalent of Terrorism.

Allow me to set aside for the moment the moral issue. I promise I will return to it.

At the pragmatic level, torture does not work; it does not return usable intelligence.

Terrorism, as a tactic of those whose military strength is too lacking to defeat a well equipped, trained and professional force, does work.

Freedom fighters/Terrorists have always sought the unorthodox as a way to convince an enemy that the fight cost more than whatever they fought for was worth.

History is full of accounts of those in rebellion attacking civilian populations sympathetic to the oppressors in order to pressure the other side to walk away. I would be hard pressed to suggest a nation that, at some point in its history, did not find recourse in irregular actions. Rules of combat and war are for those who can best take advantage of them. When the rules stand between people and their shared aspirations, the rules will be damned.

Returning to Marquess of Queensberry and his gentlemanly rules, in a boxing match against a proper opponent, I”m happy to fight fair. In a street fight against an unknown or more powerful adversary, I will kick, bite, gouge and use every dirty trick at my disposal.

And now for the moral issue. Geras, and you, are absolutely correct.

In war, the slaughter of children, women and other non-combatants at any time is morally wrong at every level I can conceive of.

But until we are prepared to recognize that a mother cradling her dead child does not care if the child died from a 500-pound bomb dropped by a B-52 or the detonation of 500 lbs of explosive in the trunk and back seat of a Mercedes, and universally condemn both acts as immoral, we will have no standing in the argument.

Both sides have made an immoral decision based upon expedients. Neither is correct.

Just as the victors get to write history, they also get to assign the labels.

Nelson Mandela, a once terrorist now recognized by many in the world as a great freedom fighter, gained his change in title, not because he shifted his tactics, but because he won,

B”shalom,

Jeff Hess

19 November 2007

GOOD NIGHT MYANMAR…

1230 by Jeff Hess

Also:

Burma brutality to haunt talks
Suu Kyi taken to state guesthouse
UN envoy says Burma has not reached “point of no return”

19 November 2007

FROM THE SANDBOX…

1200 by Jeff Hess

Combat Doc: I have recently abandoned my blog to drift through cyberspace until Google goes out of business or Skynet takes control, and have received many e-mails and requests asking to both restart and answer why. Well, here it is. Back in 2004 when Colby Buzzell and I started our blogs it was for one thing and one thing only, to get out the news…

19 November 2007

MY COMMENTS…

0905 by Jeff Hess

Part of being a good citizen of the blogosphere is visiting, reading and, most importantly, taking the time to leave a comment on other’s blogs. It’s all about the conversation. In the interest of setting an example I’ve decided to link to those blog posts that have compelled me to leave a comment.

0905 When school districts sue parents over blog posts
0659 Journalists and Bloggers

19 November 2007

THE POWELLIZING OF CONDOLEEZZA RICE…

0849 by Jeff Hess

There is a longish section in The Israel Lobby subtitled The Powellizing of Condoleezza Rice. The section is worth the read, but the gist is that the State Department has been reduced to a second-rate cabinet department. And Rice rendered powerless by an executive focused on the Department of Defense as its instrument of foreign policy.

Jill has been following this story for some time and wrote an update yesterday, but I fear that the news this morning from the Washington Post supports my thesis.

A few days after Thanksgiving, President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice plan to open a meeting in Annapolis to launch the first round of substantive Israeli-Palestinian peace talks during Bush’s presidency.

But no conference date has been set. No invitations have been issued. And no one really agrees on what the participants will actually talk about once they arrive at the Naval Academy for the meeting, which is intended to relaunch Bush’s stillborn “road map” plan to create a Palestinian state.

No date. Invitations. No agenda. There’s a recipe for success.

“No one seems to know what is happening,” one senior Arab envoy said last week, speaking on condition of anonymity to avoid appearing out of the loop. “I am completely lost.”

The envoy recounted the calls he made in recent days to dig up information and said he had reserved rooms for his country’s foreign minister and other officials. He added with exasperation: “It is a very peculiar thing.”

Do you suppose our Secretary of State knows what is happening; or perhaps more to the point, what is happening to her?

Even a senior administration official deeply involved in the preparations confided, before speaking off the record about his expectations: “I can’t connect the dots myself because it is still a work in progress.”

Uh. I guess not.

19 November 2007

FROM MY DAD…

0800 by Jeff Hess

I could never bring myself to forward all the email jokes, cartoons and other Internet comedy that land in my inbox. But then I started posting the ones my dad sends me. Judging from my comments and emails, my dad has become one of my greatest blogging assets. So for your morning blog chuckle I present: From My Dad.

A contestant on “Who Wants to be a Millionaire” had reached the final plateau. If she answered the next question correctly, she would win $1,000,000. If she answered incorrectly, she would pocket only the $32,000 milestone money. As she suspected it would be, the million-dollar question was no pushover.

It was: Which of the following species of birds does not build its own nest, but instead lays its eggs in the nests of other birds? Is it: A, the condor? B, the buzzard? C, the Cuckoo? Or D, the vulture?

The woman was on the spot.

She did not know the answer.

And she was doubly on the spot because she had used up her 50/50 lifeline and her audience-poll lifeline.

All that remained was her phone-a-friend lifeline, and the woman had hoped against all hope that she would not have to use it because the only friend that she knew would be home happened to be a blonde. But the contestant had no alternative.

She called her friend and gave her the question and the four-Choices. The blonde responded unhesitatingly: “That’s easy! The answer is C, the cuckoo.”

The contestant had to make a decision and make it fast. She had considered employing a reverse strategy and giving Meredith any answer except the one that her friend had given her. And considering that her friend was a blonde, it would seem to be the logical to do. On the other hand, the blonde had responded with such confidence, such certitude, that the contestant could not help but be persuaded.

“I need an answer,” said Meredith.

Crossing her fingers, the contestant said, “C, the cuckoo.”

“Is that your final answer?” asked Meredith.

“Yes, that is my final Answer.”

Two seconds later, Meredith said, “I regret to inform you that the answer, is absolutely, correct. You are now a millionaire!”

A few days later, the contestant hosted a party for her family and friends including the blonde who had helped her win the big million dollar jackpot.

“Jenny, I just do not know how to thank you,” said the contestant.

“Because of your knowing the answer to that final question, I am now a millionaire! And, do you want to know something? It was the assuredness with which you answered the question that convinced me to go with your choice. By the way, how did you happen to know the right answer?”

“Oh, come on!” said the blonde. “Everybody knows that Cuckoos don’t build nests. They live in clocks.”

19 November 2007

GOOD AFTERNOON MYANMAR…

0430 by Jeff Hess

What used to be the sole dominion of the most secret of government agencies — high resolution satellite photography — has become the treasure trove of non-governmental organizations seeking to prove the displace- ment or elimination of native peoples. The generals can secure their borders, but they can’t block their space above.

From the BBC:

A satellite photographs a cluster of homes in the Burmese jungle. Seven months later, the village is gone.

But the image remains, a document of the demolition of homes and the displacement of people by the military regime.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science presented these images at the UN this week during a panel discussion on human rights abuses in Burma.

These high-resolution pictures can be used to track patterns of destruction and relocation, new construction and military expansion.

The technique is so effective, the AAAS has created its own human rights department.

Lars Bromley, director of the project, told a UN audience this week: “Over the past year, we have tracked 25 sites of interest, including 18 possibly removed villages.”

To analyse evidence, Mr Bromley relies on “image pairs” of before and after shots, comparing archived images with more recent photos.

“What we mainly see are rooftops disappearing,” said Mr Bromley. “We are right at the edge of what the technology can do.”

19 November 2007

FROM MY CHAPBOOK…

0400 by Jeff Hess

My name is Jeff Hess and I’m a biblioholic. I own hundreds of books. Not valuable books, mostly Science Fiction paperbacks and text books, tomes rescued by the bag from library book sales. A few years ago, in the interest of not burying myself, I began reading more books from the library and taking notes. My electronic chapbook was born.

This is a passage I copied from Rational Mysticism: Dispatches from the border between science and spirituality by John Horgan.

“If you want to see a cell nucleus, look down this microscope. If you want to see the moons of Jupiter, look through a telescope. On the spiritual side, if you want to see your Buddha nature, if you want to see Christ consciousness, if you want to see the religious side of the equation, fold your legs, sit down each day for two hours, count your breath from one to ten. Do that for five years and get back to me.” p. 71

19 November 2007

DON’T FORGET BURMA NO. 7…

0230 by Jeff Hess

19 November 2007

TIME POWER: TODAY…

0001 by Jeff Hess

Today, as I go about my tasks, I’ll think about: Six Time Power Procedures: change routine, cultivate observation, make your motions faster, think with a pencil in your hand, make comparisons, use the spontaneous goal (ask what is the purpose of your action, pulling yourself into focus on what is relevant, on the vital issues).

A golden brick is a positive reinforcer, a compliment, an expression of care or concern. Example of golden bricks include: respecting, rewarding, acknowledging, complimenting, cooperating, caring, showing enthusiasm, trusting and loving.

Dirty bricks are negative reinforcers like putdowns, blaming, threatening, criticizing, ordering, labeling, preaching and ignoring. p. 118

18 November 2007

GOOD MORNING MYANMAR…

2030 by Jeff Hess

On its face this news report from China indicates dissension in the ranks of those seeking democracy in Myanmar, but give the primary source, the New Dim Light Of Myanmar, I wouldn’t bet the mortgage on a rat’s borough on its accuracy. The paper reminds me of the journalistic endeavors of an earlier dictatorship.

During the reign of Communism in the Soviet Union, there were two principle newspapers: Pravda (Truth), published by the Communist Party and Izvestia (Truth) published by the government. This led citizens to lament that there was no Pravda in Izvestia and no Izvestia in Pravda.

You get the idea.

But anyway, here’s what the generals are claiming through their official paper.

More ethnic peace groups in Myanmar are expressing disagreement over a recent statement by opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, while appreciating the recent liaison between the government and the detained political party leader.

The peace groups’ statements, carried in the official newspaper the New Light of Myanmar in the last two days, include those of Lahu National Development Party, Kokang Democracy and Unity Party, Shan State Army of Shan State (North) Special Region-3, Kachin Defense Army of Shan State (North) Special Region-5, Karenni nationalities People’s Liberation Front, Palaung Nationalities Group of Shan State (North) Special Region-7 and Kayinni National Peace and Development Party.

They said Aung San Suu Kyi, general secretary of the National League for Democracy (NLD), has implied that she and her party will represent the political parties and ethnic groups. They turned down her offer as she did not seek the organizations’ opinions.

The generals demonstrate that they have learned their lessons well from their Communist masters in Beijing by establishing puppet groups that pretend to represent what naturally are opposition groups.

And there there’s this neat little bit of fluff.

These organizations, which attended the constitutional national convention that ended on Sept. 3, expressed support in their announcements for the setting up of a constitution drafting commission for the move based on the detailed basic principles already adopted in the national convention and pledged their continued participation in the implementation of the state’s seven-step roadmap.

Can you say prepare for a great leap forward comrades?

18 November 2007

MUCKING OUT THE BLOGPILE…

1400 by Jeff Hess

I’m constantly tossing interesting websites into what I call my blogpile. Some of them find their way here in the form of regular posts, but more often than not they languish and get buried deeper in the pile. The end result is that I have to go back and do a bit of shoveling. Today’s item is The Wet Riffs Gallery (NSFW).

18 November 2007

GOOD NIGHT MYANMAR…

1230 by Jeff Hess

18 November 2007

FROM THE SANDBOX…

1200 by Jeff Hess

Old Blue: I had to bring the team to Bagram for a day or so to take care of some critical maintenance issues with a vehicle. While here, I ran into CPT Mike Keilty, who is a member of the original team I trained with at Ft Riley. CPT Keilty is a West Pointer who did a tour in Iraq before coming off of active duty. He is a bronze star recipient. He was pulled from the IRR…

18 November 2007

FROM MY DAD…

0800 by Jeff Hess

I could never bring myself to forward all the email jokes, cartoons and other Internet comedy that land in my inbox. But then I started posting the ones my dad sends me. Judging from my comments and emails, my dad has become one of my greatest blogging assets. So for your morning blog chuckle I present: From My Dad.

18 November 2007

GOOD AFTERNOON MYANMAR…

0430 by Jeff Hess

Most people have a pleasant image of Singapore, but it is a multi-culturual city-state whose peace is maintained by near draconian laws swiftly enforced by a police force that is more military than civic. It is no surprise then that no outdoor protests will be premitted during the Association of South East Asian Nations summit that begins on Monday.

From Reuters:

Singapore has banned all outdoor protest at a summit of Southeast Asian nations and rejected an opposition party’s request to stage a Myanmar pro-democracy protest, police and activists said on Saturday.

Leaders of the 10-member Association of South East Asian Nations are set to sign a common charter that would turn the 40-year-old group into a legal entity. Myanmar prime minister Thein Sein is expected to come, which would mark the first appearance of a top junta member at an international forum since the regime’s bloody crackdown on protesters in September.

Before the delegates have the chance to even sit down to sign the charter, opposition groups are calling the document an empty promise.

The opposition Singapore Democratic Party said on its Web site the government had rejected its application for a protest to “call on ASEAN member states to take concrete measures to promote democracy in the region rather than just make empty promises”.

Under Singapore laws, any public gathering of more than four people requires a police permit.

“The Charter states that ASEAN would promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms of the people in the region. How does ASEAN intend to do this if its chair bans outright any form of political activity?” the SDP said.

How indeed? Through goals without deadlines: wishes?

The charter — to be signed on Tuesday — will give the 40-year-old grouping legal status and spells out lofty goals for democracy and human rights.

“Myanmar has not fought to take out words like ‘human rights’ and ‘democracy’. They are not against putting these down as an aspiration, but they ask for more time,” [ASEAN secretary-general Ong Keng Yong] said.

Time? Weeks? Months? Years? Generations?

Or just until after the 2008 Summer Olympics?

18 November 2007

FROM MY CHAPBOOK…

0400 by Jeff Hess

My name is Jeff Hess and I’m a biblioholic. I own hundreds of books. Not valuable books, mostly Science Fiction paperbacks and text books, tomes rescued by the bag from library book sales. A few years ago, in the interest of not burying myself, I began reading more books from the library and taking notes. My electronic chapbook was born.

This is a passage I copied from Rational Mysticism: Dispatches from the border between science and spirituality by John Horgan.

Solving The Nirvana Paradox: “If Nirvana is so great, why does God create?” p. 69

18 November 2007

DON’T FORGET BURMA NO. 6

0230 by Jeff Hess

« Previous - Next »