15 November 2008

WHAT THEY SAID…

1841 by Jeff Hess

Michael Lewis writes:

I”d never taken an accounting course, never run a business, never even had savings of my own to manage. I stumbled into a job at Salomon Brothers in 1985 and stumbled out much richer three years later, and even though I wrote a book about the experience, the whole thing still strikes me as preposterous-which is one of the reasons the money was so easy to walk away from.

I figured the situation was unsustainable. Sooner rather than later, someone was going to identify me, along with a lot of people more or less like me, as a fraud. Sooner rather than later, there would come a Great Reckoning when Wall Street would wake up and hundreds if not thousands of young people like me, who had no business making huge bets with other people”s money, would be expelled from finance.

15 November 2008

CLASSIC LYNN JOHNSTON…

1836 by Jeff Hess

15 November 2008

EXCELLENT, ORGANIZED, AWARE, INTERESTING…

1722 by Jeff Hess

Those are just a few of the words her professor is using to describe I See Invisible People’s essays on the psychology of gender. Feed your head.

15 November 2008

YOUR $700 BILLION AT WORK…

1706 by Jeff Hess

Naomi Klein writes:

And the folks at Morgan Stanley? They’re planning to pay themselves $10.7 billion this year, much of it in bonuses – almost exactly the amount they are receiving in the first phase of the bailout. “You can imagine the devilish grins on the faces of Morgan Stanley employees,” writes Bloomberg columnist Jonathan Weil. “Not only did we, the taxpayers, save their company…we funded their 2008 bonus pool.”

14 November 2008

GONE THINKING…

1707 by Jeff Hess


No blogging, responding to emails, cell phones or encumbering myself in anything else
electronic until 1706 tomorrow as I continue my going out from Egypt.

14 November 2008

SOME SAVAGE LOVE…

1105 by Jeff Hess

I read Dan Savage’s column every week. And I’ve seen him on television before, but his CNN performance with Anderson Cooper on Wednesday is riveting.

The parting reference to the studies of Big Tobacco was dead on.

14 November 2008

WHAT THEY SAID…

1055 by Jeff Hess

Tim Russo writes:

I think it would be a very big mistake to simply turn this list over to the DNC, for the above reasons, and others. Political hacks like nothing more than someone handing them a list they themselves put zero work into. Thus, they abuse the list, as the DNC most certainly will. The DNC will have no ownership interest in the list, it”s like free money. And that”s what the DNC will use it for, almost exclusively – money.

This list should be used to govern.

It should be at Barack Obama”s disposal, whenever he needs it to push change. Barack should use the list to pressure Congress when he needs to. Barack should engage the list in the debate about policy. Barack should target the list to key congressional races – key races only. And the list should become a place safe from petty partisanship which would kill it.

For example, during the campaign, Barack said he”d like to put the health care reform discussions on CSPAN. Use the list to get people to give their input on those discussions, create a dialog, and from that, a consensus on policy that the American people can support, beginning with Barack”s list. That way, whatever bullshit lobbying effort is created to kill it will fail because the American people, beginning with the list, were engaged, consulted, and support Barack.

This cannnot work if the list is owned by the DNC. It is Barack”s list, and should stay that way, not for Barack, but for the country.

14 November 2008

FROM 28 AUGUST 2006…

1031 by Jeff Hess

Here’s what frosts my shorts. A year or so ago I got into a conversation with a fellow educator who lamented the results of the having President George Bush in office for eight years. My friend agreed that Bush’s leadership was a mess, but said that no one could have known in 2000, that we would be where we are in 2007.

I replied that of course we could have known. That I knew of multiple experts who told us again and again that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; that Saddam Hussein had no connection to either Osama bin Laden or the attacks on 11 September 01; that abandoning the war in Afghanistan was a bad idea.

My friend’s reply was that nobody could have known and that hindsight was always 20/20.

We should all play this video over and over again whenever such people tell us that the our leaders in both Congress and the White House couldn’t have known that the economy would tank in 2008.

14 November 2008

YES HE IS…

0736 by Jeff Hess

14 November 2008

MY COMMENTS…

0724 by Jeff Hess

0722: Tremont rant #1 – Dear east-side visitors – get a frickin map

14 November 2008

WE ARE NOT THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING…

0721 by Jeff Hess

14 November 2008

THE DIVISIVE ISSUE WITH MORAL DIMENSIONS…

0702 by Jeff Hess

Ben Szobody writes:

The priest at St. Mary’s Catholic Church in downtown Greenville has told parishioners that those who voted for Barack Obama placed themselves under divine judgment because of his stance on abortion and shouldn’t receive Holy Communion until they’ve done penance.
Advertisement

The Rev. Jay Scott Newman told The Greenville News on Wednesday that church teaching doesn’t allow him to refuse Holy Communion to anyone based on political choices, but that he’ll continue to deliver the church’s strong teaching on the “intrinsic and grave evil of abortion” as a hidden form of murder.

Both Obama and Joe Biden, the vice president-elect, support legal abortions. Obama has called it a “divisive issue” with a “moral dimension,” and has pledged to make women’s rights under Roe v. Wade a “priority” as president. He opposes a constitutional amendment overturning the Supreme Court decision.

This is an example of why I voted to make now president-elect Barack Hussein Obama the political leader of the United States of America for the next four years. He gets it.

I honestly believe that President-elect Obama and Rev. Newman could have a conversation. And that is an example of what Jill and I mean when we dismiss the politics of exclusion by association. If we all don’t engage in conversation we all lose.

In the us-or-them world of President George Bush and Karl Rove purity is everything. We’re allowed to dismiss all of a person because we disagree with a part of a person. President-elect Obama rejects that paradigm.

I am so ready for 20 January.

13 November 2008

MY COMMENTS…

1551 by Jeff Hess

1551: Tina Brown: Who does look after Palin”s kids?

0711: Cafaro elected minority leader, GOP adds 2nd woman in OH state senate

13 November 2008

IT’S LIKE HAVING OUR OWN SARAH PALIN…

1416 by Jeff Hess

Rut row…

13 November 2008

WHAT THEY SAID…

1414 by Jeff Hess

David Hendrickson says:

The economic crisis Obama is inheriting is like the first President Bush”s gift of Somalia to the Clinton administration. After the 1992 election, President Bush sent substantial forces to Somalia, which became an enormous headache for Clinton. It was a parting gift. Now multiply the headache by 100 times. It”s not an entirely apt analogy, but the Bush Administration”s response to the financial crisis is a huge albatross for Obama.

13 November 2008

THEY MUST BE CAREFULLY TAUGHT…

0821 by Jeff Hess

Via KIDK…

13 November 2008

WHAT THEY SAID…

0721 by Jeff Hess

Robert Stein writes:

It took JFK three months to stumble over the no-win Cuban invasion he inherited in 1961, but Barack Obama is in a deeper mess as he makes his first visit to the Oval Office more than two months before taking over.

The Bush Administration is fumbling the financial bailout in ways that make CIA planning for the Bay of Pigs look brilliant, and this time the new president won’t have the option of pulling back and starting all over.

And:

Even before he takes office, President Obama may find himself asking the question that plagued Casey Stengel when he took over the hapless New York Mets, “Can’t anybody here play this game?”

13 November 2008

CAN PAUL NOW LEAD HIS REVOLUTION…?

0657 by Jeff Hess

Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas) writes:

Now, in light of the election, many are asking: What is the future of the Republican Party?

But that is the wrong question. The proper question should be: Where is our country heading? There’s no doubt that a large majority of Americans believe we’re on the wrong track. That’s why the candidate demanding “change” won the election. It mattered not that the change offered was no change at all, only a change in the engineer of a runaway train.

OK Tim, can President-elect Barack Hussein Obama keep the A-Train on the tracks?

13 November 2008

RACING TO THE BOTTOM OF THE WELL…

0650 by Jeff Hess

Catherine Brahic writes:

At the moment, the only legal framework is a 1997 agreement under the United Nations relating to “non-navigable freshwater resources”. The document was initially drafted to regulate the use of surface water, and attempts are underway to extend it to underground resources as well.

The political intricacies of such a legal framework are considerable. For starters, aquifers fall into two gross categories: those that are recharged by rainfall permeating from the surface and “fossil” aquifers, such as the famous Nubian sandstone aquifer beneath Egypt, Sudan, Chad and Libya. These contain water that can be tens of thousands of years old, relics of a much wetter climate. Crucially, they are not recharged by rainwater, making them finite resources.

Exploiting fossil aquifers is “a race to the bottom,” says [Mark] Zeitoun, [a water policy expert at the London School of Economics]. “Typically they are seen in much the same way as diamond mines.” Nations that share a fossil aquifer must agree on how to run that race – but they don’t always agree, and that can cause conflict.

Rechargeable aquifers present an entirely different political – and scientific – challenge. The best use of the water from an environmental perspective is to use the water at the same rate as it is naturally recharged, or more slowly.

This implies knowing how the aquifer is recharged and agreeing on the fairest way of sharing the water that can be sustainably extracted each year. “You have to really understand the water flow, so you can put sustainable limits on its exploitation,” says Zeitoun.

13 November 2008

ALASKA: THE NEW OHIO…

0628 by Jeff Hess

Sean Cockerham writes:

Mark Begich made a dramatic comeback Wednesday to overtake Ted Stevens for the lead in Alaska’s U.S. Senate race.

Begich, who was losing after election night, now leads Stevens by 814 votes — 132,196 to 131,382 — with the state still to count roughly 35,000 more ballots over the next week.

The state Division of Elections tallied some 60,000 absentee, early and questioned ballots on Wednesday. The ballots broke heavily in the Democrat’s favor, erasing the 3,000-vote lead Stevens held after election night Nov. 4.

Stevens, a 40-year incumbent, is trying to become the first person ever elected to the U.S. Senate after a being found guilty of felony crimes.

The state still needs to count at least 15,000 questioned ballots and an estimated 20,000 absentee ballots that made it to the Division of Elections after election day last Tuesday.

I have to wonder if in a pre-Florida 2000/Ohio 2004 electoral world if Stevens would have been declared the winner and all those pesky other ballots might have just gone away.

« Previous - Next »