THIS WILL NOT GO AWAY…
1659 by Jeff Hess
I have no idea how many families face this each year; tens, hundreds, thousands? But our Congress and President have chosen to bring it to the fore and now that it is on our collective horizon, we will not see it pass easily. I cannot comment on or judge what is in the hearts of the family members involved; that is something with which they must wrestle alone. In the realm of public discourse, however, we much sit and speak together of life and death.
As a society we face ever improving medical technology capable of maintaining a body indefinintely like Neo in the pod before he took the red pill. The question we don’t seem to be clearly addressing is this: what is it that makes us, us? Are we the sum of the chemical reactions and electrical signals flashing through our brains? And if these are something we can measure accurately, are we confident that we can measure some point, some chasm, between here and not-here? Can we come back once we’ve leapt the gap, or is it a one-way street?
If we are not-here, if it is the reptilian mind that abets the beating of a heart, the heaving of lungs, does it cease to be about us and turn, instead, to being about our others?
I am reminded of the ghoulishness of pet owners who have Fluffy freeze dried and stuffed so that she can curl naturally on her pillow for eternity-or at least until her owner also dies.
Letting go is perhaps the hardest thing we do. I once had a friend who believed fervently in those who pretend to speak with the dead. When I asked her why, she was quick with her honest answer: because she could not bear to live without those gone.
Are those who hold out for miracles any different? When does hope become irrational? Granted, our information is not complete. We do not yet know where the gap between here and not-here is. But we do know that it exists. And doctors can speak with authority about those who are not coming back.
The Expert Witness has clouded many issues in our society. When attorneys present expert witnesses to support their clients they create the illusion of authority. But in every instance that matters, opposing experts can not both be correct. One or the other must be wrong. In considering a debate we want to weigh both sides equally. But they do not always deserve such consideration.
We saw an example of this recently when C Span thought it should balance its coverage of a lecture by Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt by matching it with speech by Holocaust denier David Irving. The two are in no stretch of the imagination equal authorities, but in our quest for fair and balanced coverage, we incorrectly give credence to those who deserve none.
Such is the case in the Life and Death debate. While doctors are human and make mistakes, taken as a whole, they do understand the human body. They provide us with the best information as to when it is reasonable to expect recovery and when it is reasonable for those still living to accept loss.
Death used to be simple.
p.s. and yes, i have carefully not brought issues of soul into this discussion because, regardless of what we want to feel, there simply is no evidence for such a thing.
My Soundtrack: Horowitz In Moscow by Vladimir Horowitz.

In My Backpack…
The wonderful poet 
Courtesty of George Nemeth at 
One of the advantages of the cyber move I made last month from Texas to New Jersey, is that Have Coffee Will Write now has an 
I’ve been Nannied! One of the pieces-parts jobs I do is run the computer lab for a Jewish supplementary school. The administration has wisely, and appropriately, installed 
Via my daily reading of Chris Muir’s
Turns out the Terri Schiavo Talking Points Memo (full text below) was real. Mike Allen of The Washington Post reports this morning in 
At the very first coffee house I visited on the Louisville: The Coffee House Tour last month, I encountered a bumper sticker on the back of the cash registers that read: Keep Louisville Weird. (See 
For your consideration, two completely different videos: 
Well, I’ve sorted through 



