Angie Schmitt writes:
Leading this philosophical sea change is a nonprofit group representing the state’s incorporated cities and suburbs: the Michigan Municipal League. The League recently published a manifesto for the state’s renewal titled “The Economics of Place.”
League CEO and Economics of Place author Dan Gilmartin explains, studies have shown that 65 percent of college-educated young people look, first, for an attractive place to live and, second, for a job.
I’d love to read the report, particularly to see how the questions were asked and who qualifies as a college educated young person, but I’m not ready to pay the $14.95 required to get a copy.
I can’t say anything about the former, but I’ll hazard an educated guess to suggest that anyone who has attended some educational institution beyond high school and who is between the ages of 18 and 30 qualifies as a college educated young person.
The reason I make the distinction is that if I am a recently degreed young person, I’d love to live in Hawaii, but I’m not likely to move there because I know the cost of living is high and the job opportunities (unless I’m an oceanographer) are low.
Kevin Costner not with standing, the philosophy of if we build it, he will come, just doesn’t make sense; but when you’re a not-for-profit selling downtown living, that may be the only tool in your kit.
Go back 50 years and take a look at San Jose, California. Does anyone really think that it became the center of Silicon Valley because it was an attractive place to live?