16 February 2017

REMEMBER WHAT KILLED H.G. WELLS’ MARTIANS…

0400 by Jeff Hess

Ralph Nader, in An E.Coli’s Message to President Trump, writes:

The current troubling news reports from China are describing a major Avian Flu epidemic among huge flocks of chickens. Such epidemics have been worrisome to public health specialists because they could be the precursor of transmission to humans and a possible global pandemic. Since President Trump is developing his policy against “terrorism”, I’m reproducing below a fictional letter from E.coli 0104:H4 to his predecessor that highlights the big leagues of terrorism against innocents by deadly bacteria and viruses. I re-submit this letter to President Trump:

Dear President Trump:

My name is E.coli 0104:H4. I am being detained in a German Laboratory in Bavaria, charged with being “a highly virulent strain of bacteria.” Together with many others like me, the police have accused us of causing about 20 deaths and nearly five hundred cases of kidney failure–so far. Massive publicity and panic all around.

You can’t see me, but your scientists can. They are examining me and I know my days are numbered. I hear them calling me a “biological terrorist,” an unusual combination of two different E.coli bacteria cells. One even referred to me as a “conspiracy of mutants.”

It is not my fault, I want you to know. I cannot help but harm innocent humans, and I am very sad about this. I want to redeem myself, so I am sending this life-saving message straight from my petri dish to you.

This outbreak in Germany has been traced to food–location unknown. What is known to you is that invisible terrorism from bacterium and viruses take massively greater lives than the terrorism you are spending billions of dollars and armaments to stop in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Malaria, caused by infection with one of four species of Plasmodium, a parasite transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes destroys a million lives a year. Many of the victims are children and pregnant women. Mycobacterium tuberculosis takes over one million lives each year. The human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV) causes over a million deaths each year as well. Many other microorganisms in the water, soil, air, and food are daily weapons of mass destruction. Very little in Continue Reading »

16 February 2017

WE HAVEN’T GONE OVER THE CLIMATE CLIFF, YET…

0300 by Jeff Hess

15 February 2017

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN JIM RENACCI (OH-16):
INDIVISIBLE DISTRICT 16 VISITS RENACCI’S STAFF…

1200 by Jeff Hess

I need to pay better attention to the other editions of my free, local, weekly newspaper The (Royalton) Post. While browsing that edition this morning, the headline—Renacci shares thoughts on ACA repeal, replacement—Community group concerned about future for those covered under ACA—caught my eye. The story appeared in the Northern Wayne edition of the paper and was written by the edition’s editor, Emily Canning-Dean. She began:

With a new year upon us, a new Congress and a new president sworn into office, healthcare has become a hot button issue among many people across the country.

Some feel the Affordable Care Act is inefficient and needs to be repealed and replaced, while others fear its repeal will mean millions will no longer have health coverage.

Members from a community group known as Indivisible District 16 met with some of District 16 Congressman Jim Renacci’s staff members Jan. 18 to discuss the Affordable Care Act. According to a press release from Indivisible District 16, the group is concerned the repeal of the Affordable Care Act will lead to nearly one million Ohioans losing their health coverage.

Clear, concise and to the point. She might, however, have served her readership (and Renacci’s constituents) better if she had provided context, and a link in the electronic version, to just what Indivisible is so that readers would understand that the local group is actually part of a national organization.

As long as Republicans in our House of Representatives understood that their many, many votes to repeal the Affordable Care Act were meaningless posturing, they were free to use the stunts to energize their base. Now that Republicans control Congress and the White House, such votes have real consequences for real Americans and real people are waking up that Republicans want to kick them off the healthcare bus.

We The People, in the form of Indivisible and other organizations, will not let that stand.

Previously…

14 February 2017

WRITING IS HARD, BUT IT IS JOYOUS…

0400 by Jeff Hess

14 February 2017

MANAGER YOUR TIME BY MANAGING YOUR ENERGY…

0300 by Jeff Hess

Occasionally I find a post—rather than a comic—from Scott Adams worth repeating. This post on managing energy to manage time resonates with all the reading I’ve been doing from Cal Newport since I finished his Deep Work last year. The key challenge to the strategy is that most people do are not self-employed and able to set a schedule that best fits them and not their bosses, their co-workers or their clients. Still, I think at least making he attempt is valuable.

Scheduling Your Energy, Not Your Time

If you plan your schedule around your availability, you’re probably doing it wrong. Years ago I learned that planning my schedule to match my different energy states works far better. Here are my usual energy states during a typical day. And by that I mean my mind and body are optimized for different tasks at different times. These energy states are fairly predictable in my case, so I build my schedule around them.

Creative energy (best between 4-10 a.m.)
Social energy (best between 4-11 p.m.)
Communication energy (phone calls, email, texts) (best between 10-11 a.m.)
Learning energy (any time except afternoon)
Physical energy (exercise) (Best at lunchtime)
Sexual energy (Testosterone is highest in morning, trails off all day. Sooner is better.)

Your energy profile might differ, but I think you will find that most writers use the early morning to do their best work. The secret sauce is that you can accomplish more in less time if your energy is right for the task. I can do more creative work between 4-5 a.m. than I can get done in an entire afternoon.

Everyone is different, so pay attention to your own energy states and plan accordingly. And if you don’t have a flexible schedule, think about how you could work toward it in the long run, because happiness is influenced by when you do things, not just the nature of those activities. If you find yourself exercising when you are already tired, and eating when you are not hungry, that’s a bad schedule.

Adams is right about early mornings. Sure there are plenty of writers who are night owls, but for every night owl, my observation has been that there are 10 larks.

13 February 2017

TRUMP V. TRUTH: JOHN OLIVER RETURNS…

0300 by Jeff Hess

12 February 2017

SHOWDOWN COMING ON PUBLIC SUBSIDIES

1200 by Roldo Bartimole

1990 issue 2 roldo

For the first time in more than two decades two civic organizations are opposing an Establishment desire to seize more public dollars to subsidize a downtown development—the Quicken Arena.

Citizens are actually challenging the political leadership and their corporate dictators, the Greater Cleveland Partnership, which represents high-powered business and legal elites.

This is not apparently what County Executive Armond Budish and Mayor Frank Jackson were expecting when they bowed to Dan Gilbert on a scheme to revamp the Q. Both Councils—city and county—will also have to sign off on deal that will cost more than $280 million over 17 years.

Pretty disgusting.

This new opposition has the resistance quality prominent now in national politics against President Donald Trump. It represents an awareness of the misuse of public resources as part of the inequality that plagues working people.

The Gateway Economic Development Corp.—operators of Progressive Field and Q Arena—quietly canceled its monthly February meeting. This prevents any public opportunity to protest the new grab of public money before the city and county votes.

Likewise as suspicious was the snatch of Scene alternative newspaper boxes from downtown locations. The excuse given was workers of the Downtown Cleveland Alliance, a pseudo private government and offshoot of the Greater Cleveland Partnership, picked up the boxes for safety reasons. Of their own volition. I’ve have talked with some of these workers. They would not act without direction. So Joe Marinucci, Alliance boss, ($208,000 salary, $53,898 benefits) should come clean on the motives an organization packed with developers from John Ferchill to Fred Geis. Joe, tell us the truth. What goes?

The money confiscation is especially repulsive when one considers Cuyahoga County voters already passed a 20-year sin tax worth some $260 million. It was supposed to finance the sports facilities.

However, the politicians and Gilbert want none of this touched. They want to create NEW public subsidies. Their ravenousness never satisfied.

Where will they acquire this new money? $16 million from county funds; $44 million sliced from public bed taxes and $88 million from city admission taxes from 2024-2036. Why those dates? Because those taxes are being used already for Gateway bonds on arena overruns back from the mid-1990. The tax grab on those bonds ends December Continue Reading »

12 February 2017

[UPDATED] N.R. POST POLL’S SURPRISE RESULT….

0300 by Jeff Hess

170212 saturday night live snl cold opening trump sean spicer north royalton post poll

So, my copy of the free weekly North Royalton Post arrived in my mailbox yesterday and, as always I turned to the opinion pages first. The head of the Publisher’s Notebook asks: Is SNL funny or sad? (This column is not yet available online, I’ll post a link ASAP.) Post Publisher Bruce Trogdon writes:

What seems apparent to me ow is that Saturday Night Live has moved to consciously attacking Donald Trump in a a way they never have before. Is this because they have an ax to grind? Are they simply giving their target younger audience what it wants to hear? I am not sure. One thing I will also say is that Trump has asked for it with his own over-the-top style. You reap what you sow. Is he reaping what he deserves?

My guess is that Trogdon wrote his column on Wednesday, or possibly Thursday, when the poll had only been up for one or two days. I doubt that he had yet seen the surprising (for his expected readership which he described as of above average intelligence and [desirous of] a serious and balanced discussion of the issues). As I write this on Sunday morning the poll results are:

What do you think about SNL’s portrayal of President Trump and his team?

[The new poll is up. This may be the final update @ 0421 on 15 February:

Hilarious! I can’t get enough, 468 votes, 53.7 percent;
It can be funny, but also a bit too disrespectful, 63 votes, 7.2 percent;
It was funny at first but now it’s played out, 83 votes, 9.5 percent; and
Time to retire the boring and unfunny show, 258 votes, 29.6 percent.

Updated @ 0629 on 14 February:

Hilarious! I can’t get enough, 443 votes, 53.2 percent;
It can be funny, but also a bit too disrespectful, votes, 7.4 percent;
It was funny at first but now it’s played out, 68 votes, 9.2 percent; and
Time to retire the boring and unfunny show, 248 votes, 29.8 percent.

Updated @ 0942 on 13 February:

Hilarious! I can’t get enough, 399 votes, 54.0 percent;
It can be funny, but also a bit too disrespectful, 61 votes, 7.3 percent;
It was funny at first but now it’s played out, 80 votes, 9.6 percent; and
Time to retire the boring and unfunny show, 217 votes, 29.4 percent.]

Hilarious! I can’t get enough, 340 votes, 54.8 percent;
It can be funny, but also a bit too disrespectful, 46 votes, 7.4 percent;
It was funny at first but now it’s played out, 55 votes, 8.9 percent; and
Time to retire the boring and unfunny show, 179 votes, 28.9 percent.

Having women lampoon President Donald John Trump’s staff—Melissa McCarthy as Sean Spicer and Kate McKinnon as Jeff Sessions—is brilliant, as shown in last evening’s cold open. Enjoy.

Of course, SNL is far from alone.

11 February 2017

WHY DO WE WANT MORE THAN ALL WE CAN BE…?

1200 by Jeff Hess

Last year I distributed images to several friends and associates of Superman and Wonder Woman in the power poses described by Amy Cuddy in her TED Talk. Cuddy’s concept is akin to the Fake it until you make it philosophy and has come under attack in the years since she first proposed her idea, but still Cuddy’s video speaks to a human need to be special.

Oliver Burkeman, writing in The art of taking action. Or not for The Guardian, concluded:

In an old Zen parable quoted by Krech, a monk asks his superior what to do about being too hot. His reply: “When it is hot, let it be so hot that it kills you.” Not literally: that’d be a rubbish productivity tip. But spending less time battling discomfort? That’s a productivity tip to beat them all. To be able to do what needs doing, whether or not you feel like it, is pretty close to a superpower.

Superpowers seem a bit in these days. Perhaps that’s due to the insufferable spate of Marvel/DC Comic action movies, but I think there is more of a Potteresque desire to think we’re somehow extraordinary. In his book, Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World, Cal Newport wrote: I firmly believe that deep work is like a superpower in our current economy: it enables you to quickly (and deliberately) learn complicated new skills and produce high-value output at a high rate.

We no longer are happy with being, as Army recruiting commercials promised in the ’80s, all that we can be. That’s for slackers. If we’re not superhuman we’re just boring.

11 February 2017

SENATORS CALL FOR ACTION ON 25 FEBRUARY…

0400 by Jeff Hess

170214 bernie sanders chuck schumer letter health care

10 February 2017

WOULD JACKSON TELL TRUMP TO BACK OFF…?

1000 by Jeff Hess

Is there a possibility that even King Mob I (President Andrew Jackson) might advise King Mob II that he’s going to far in confronting the judiciary and criticizing the obligation of the branch to exercise the checks and balances defined by our Constitution? Jackson infamously took on the Supreme Court Of The United States’ decision in McCulloch v. Maryland.

Jeffrey Rosen, writing in Not Even Andrew Jackson Went as Far as Trump in Attacking the Courts for The Atlantic, explains:

President Trump’s attacks on the federal appellate judges considering a constitutional challenge to his immigration ban—he called the proceedings “disgraceful” and the courts “so political”—has provoked widespread condemnation from across the political spectrum. Even Judge Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, said the criticisms were “demoralizing” and “disheartening.”

Some might look for a historical precedent for Trump’s attacks in the alleged comments of Trump’s hero Andrew Jackson, who criticized Chief Justice John Marshall’s decision in a case involving the Cherokee Indians. “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it,” the former president allegedly said. In fact, Jackson, whose portrait hangs in Trump’s office, provides no historical support for Trump’s unprecedented personal assault on the motives of judges evaluating the constitutionality of his executive orders. Jackson criticized Marshall on constitutional, rather than political, terms, and he ultimately required Congress and the states to acknowledge the Supreme Court’s authority to interpret the Constitution, rather than threaten to disregard it.

Jackson’s constitutional clashes with Marshall were precipitated by the most important constitutional clash of the early republic, involving the Bank of the United States. At Alexander Hamilton’s urging, Congress established the First National Bank of the United States in 1791 and the Second National Bank in 1816. States, who feared competition with their own banks, insisted that the National Bank violated principles of federalism and exceeded Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce.

Rosen concludes

:…Nothing in Jackson’s constitutional legacy compares with President Trump’s attempts to malign the motives of individual judges or to suggest they are merely politicians in robes. On the contrary, Jackson challenged the Supreme Court on constitutional, rather than political, grounds, insisting on his own power to interpret the Constitution in ways that differed from Chief Justice Marshall, but ultimately avoiding a direct conflict with the Supreme Court and requiring Congress and the states to accept the authority of federal judges to expound the Constitution. For this reason, Jackson—like other presidents who clashed with the Supreme Court, including Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, and Harry Truman—preserved and acknowledged the independence of the judiciary and encouraged citizens to respect it.

Does Trump really want this fight, or is this really Steve Bannon pulling the strings again?

10 February 2017

BERNIE DEBATES TED: AFFORDABLE HEALTHCARE…

0800 by Jeff Hess

Fast forward to 7:24 to get right to the debate.

From Our Revolution:

On Tuesday night, Senators Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz debated on CNN about Obamacare and the future of health care. Ted Cruz had a difficult time answering the questions posed to him on what Republicans would do if they repealed the Affordable Care Act. Bernie pointed out that 20 million more people got insurance under the Obamacare. It’s not a plan to just tell them sorry.

One of my proudest moments throughout the presidential campaign was the fact that so many people wanted to improve upon Obamacare, not repeal it. We were mocked by the establishment for our belief that we could organize a movement for single-payer health care, but the critics soon realized there was a large movement being built around it.

A single payer medicare-for-all solution is possible if we organize and make health care a top issue in the 2018 elections.

In America, if you are rich you have access to the very best health care in the world—for the rest of us, it was a crap shoot until Obamacare came along. And while the Affordable Care Act made improvements in health care for the vast majority of Americans, there are still millions who can’t access affordable health care. Every Continue Reading »

10 February 2017

I SEE A GREAT FUTURE FOR SCOUT MALDONADO…

0600 by Jeff Hess

170210 joe maldonadoa cub scouts boy scouts scouting transgender

I have no doubt that Joe Maldonado will uphold the Cub Scout Promise to do his best.

Scouting is changing and that is all very good.

Previously…

10 February 2017

MAYOR FRANK JACKSON CONTINUES TO ACT AS
CORPORATE STOOGE IN PUBLIC SQUARE DEBATE

0500 by Roldo Bartimole

Why is the Plain Dealer handling Mayor Frank Jackson with velvet gloves?

The mayor’s absurd stance on Public Square—that terrorism is a reason for keeping Superior Avenue closed, putting public transit in a hammerlock—is laughable.

Where’s the cartoon for this sham?

Jackson’s is a stubborn position without merit. It’s absurd and someone should say so.

He needs a public spanking.

Jackson’s ridiculousness brings back memories of Mayor Ralph Perk who wanted a national convention here and to dodge the lack of hotel rooms wanted a boat docked on Lake Erie to accommodate visitors. That too was laughable.

The new report on transit use of Public Square says a closed Superior means the loss to RTA is $805,000 a year. And costly lost time for customers.

Maybe the behind-the-scenes people at the Greater Cleveland Partnership should be asked to explain why they don’t want buses on Public Square.

It has been apparently easy for the GCP, its corporate sponsors and any mayor to arm twist RTA since the transit outfit serves primarily people who need to get around without their BMWs or other fancy cars.

They’re easy to push around.

RTA has been extorted before. RTA financed $13 million for the walkway from Tower City to the Q and Progressive field. Why should transit money be used for the convenience of the teams, without reimbursement?

Further, when the corporate people wanted to build the nearly useless Waterfront Line, they wanted it now! Pronto! So RTA was forced to finance the $69 million money-losing rapid line from its own budget resources. RTA could have received federal funding for most of the project. However, that would mean environmental studies and therefore delays. So RTA got pushed into financing the whole thing to meet the opening of the Rock Continue Reading »

10 February 2017

IMPRISON THOSE WHO HIRE ILLEGALS IN AMERICA…

0400 by Jeff Hess

170210 tom the dancing bug ruben bollings trump memo illegals

If a company is hiring illegal aliens to do jobs that belong to American citizens, then is that not treason? Do they not deserve our contempt and condemnation? Ought they not to be prosecuted and punished to the fullest extent of the law? Of course they do!

10 February 2017

THE DNC IS A SMOKING PILE OF RUBBLE

0300 by Jeff Hess

At a political meeting this past week I got to see just how great the level of denial among old-line Democrats is when a woman told the group that she felt uncomfortable and wasn’t sure she was in the right place because the conversation had turned to taking over the Democratic Party from the inside. I could see her discomfort. She appeared on the edge of a panic attack perhaps arising from the fear that she had inadvertently slipped into a political twilight zone where marching in lockstep with the orders from the Democratic National Committee was not the safe and sane path she believed.

She was right. Taking back our country from those who wish to dismantle every progressive gain made in the past 100 years will not be for the faint of heart. Doing more of the same will not work.

This morning I’m reading Glenn Greenwald’s Tom Perez Apologizes for Telling the Truth, Showing Why Democrats’ Flaws Urgently Need Attention at The Intercept. Greenwald ledes:

The more alarmed one is by the Trump administration, the more one should focus on how to fix the systemic, fundamental sickness of the Democratic Party. That Hillary Clinton won the meaningless popular vote on her way to losing to Donald Trump, and that the singular charisma of Barack Obama kept him popular, have enabled many to ignore just how broken and failed the Democrats are as a national political force.

An endless array of stunning statistics can be marshaled to demonstrate the extent of that collapse. But perhaps the most compelling piece of evidence is that even one of the U.S. media’s most stalwart Democratic loyalists, writing in an outlet that is as much of a reliable party organ as the DNC itself, has acknowledged the severity of the destruction. “The Obama years have created a Democratic Party that’s essentially a smoking pile of rubble,” wrote Vox’s Matthew Yglesias after the 2016 debacle, adding that “the story of the 21st-century Democratic Party looks to be overwhelmingly the story of failure.”

A failed, collapsed party cannot form an effective resistance. Trump did not become president and the Republicans do not dominate virtually all levels of government because there is some sort of massive surge in enthusiasm for right-wing extremism. Quite the contrary: This all happened because the Democrats are perceived—with good reason—to be out of touch, artificial, talking points-spouting automatons who serve Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and the agenda of endless war, led by millionaires and funded by oligarchs to do the least amount possible for ordinary, powerless citizens while still keeping their votes.

No in my United States of America. I didn’t risk my life in the service of my nation for 11 years to quietly allow what I fought for just disappear into a billionaires bottom line. Greenwald continues:

What drove Bernie Sanders’s remarkably potent challenge to Hillary Clinton was the extreme animosity of huge numbers of Democrats—led by its youngest voters—to the values, practices, and corporatist loyalties of the party’s establishment. Unlike the 2008 Democratic primary war — which was far more vicious and nasty but devoid of any real ideological conflict—the 2016 primary was grounded in important and substantive disputes about what the Democratic Party should be, what principles should guide it, and, most important of all, whose interests it should serve.

That’s why those disputes have not disappeared with the inauguration of Trump, nor should they. It matters a great deal, perhaps more than anything else, who leads the resistance to Trump and what the nature of that opposition is. Everyone knows the popular cliché that insanity means doing the same thing over and over and expecting different outcomes; it illustrates why Democrats cannot continue as is and expect anything other than ongoing impotence and failure. The party’s steadfast refusal to change course even in symbolic ways—We hereby elevate by acclamation Chuck “Wall Street” Schumer and re-install Nancy “I’m a multimillionaire and we are capitalists” Pelosi — bodes very poorly for its future success.

This, for me is the nut: Bernie voters were robbed, not by Bernie, but by that cadre of New Democrats who think they can be just progressive to placate the 99 percent while groveling at the feet of their oligarch masters.

No more.

All of this is preamble to what Greenwald really wants to write about: why we must all work our butts off to see that Keith Ellison is the next chair of the Democratic National Committee. As I would expect, Greenwald forms a far superior argument as to why Ellison is the right person at the right time for progressives, and I’ll leave him to convince you. Greenwald concludes:

One can spend all of one’s time and energy denouncing Donald Trump. But until the systemic causes that gave rise to him are addressed and resolved, those denunciations will do little other than generate social media benefits and flattering applause from those already devoted to opposing him. Focusing on and attempting to counter the fundamental flaws of the Democratic Party is not a distraction from #TheResistance; it is a central priority, a prerequisite for any kind of success.

We the people, the 99 percent, need Keith Ellison.

9 February 2017

HAPPY VALENTINES DAY, SENATOR PORTMAN…!

0300 by Jeff Hess

News and events from the Cuyahoga County Progressive Caucus:

CCPC Valentine’s Day Doubleheader

Game 1 (Pregame)—Sending All Our Love to Senator Portman: A CCPC and Indivisible Guide Project. We hope you can pick up the sarcasm! We should not be happy with Portman’s support of the Swamp Cabinet. Now we want to be sure that Portman knows that the people he is supposed to represent DO NOT support his choice for Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch. Here’s what you can do:

1) Find a sheet of paper and an envelope;

2) Write a letter to Senator Portman voicing your opinion about the Supreme Court choice. One handwritten, or typed, and signed page is enough. BE SURE to include a few questions so that his staff will have to take the time and respond. ALSO include a return address so you can get a response;

3) Fold the letter and seal it in an envelope;

4) Write “Senator Portman” on the front of the envelope AND your return address (again) in the top left; and

5) Return it to one of these locations:

  • Harvard Community Services Center @ 18204 Harvard Ave. Cleveland between 6:30 and 8:30 pm today.
  • Starbucks @ 12405 Cedar Rd. Cleveland Heights between 1 and 4 pm Sunday.
  • CCPC Office @ 11910 Detroit Ave. Lakewood anytime via mail slot Continue Reading »
  • 8 February 2017

    PRESIDENT TRUMP AND SLOBODON MILOŠEVIĆ…

    0400 by Jeff Hess

    After the election of President Donald John Trump, sales of George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984 soared. I think that a homegrown American novel is the one that deserves a wider and closer readership. In 1935 Sinclair Lewis wrote his semi-satirical novel: It Can’t Happen Here:

    The novel describes the rise of Berzelius “Buzz” Windrip, a politician who defeats Franklin Delano Roosevelt and is elected President of the United States, after fomenting fear and promising drastic economic and social reforms while promoting a return to patriotism and “traditional” values. After his election, Windrip takes complete control of the government and imposes a plutocratic/totalitarian rule with the help of a ruthless paramilitary force, in the manner of Adolf Hitler and the SS. The novel’s plot centers on journalist Doremus Jessup’s opposition to the new regime and his subsequent struggle against it as part of a liberal rebellion.

    I thought of Lewis’ work, which I read in high school, as I read Peter Maass’ What Slobodan Milosevic Taught Me About Donald Trump for The Intercept this morning. Maass begins:

    During his inaugural address, Donald Trump deployed rhetoric that was familiar to anyone who spent time in the Balkans in the 1990s. “You will never be ignored again,” Trump thundered, with Congress as his backdrop. He expanded on the idea a few days later, during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security, where he said, “To all of those hurting out there, I repeat to you these words, we hear you, we see you, and you will never, ever be ignored again.”

    Trump’s message was a variation, directed at his largely white constituency, of the you-shall-not-be-beaten-again rhetoric used with malignant effect by Slobodan Miloševi? during the collapse of Yugoslavia. Trump is not Milošević and the United States is not Yugoslavia, of course, but the echoes between these paragons of national shamelessness reveal the underlying methods and weaknesses of what Trump is trying to pull off.

    In 1987, Milošević was sent to Kosovo to soothe angry Serbs who felt threatened by Albanians who dominated the province. A low-profile communist official at the time, Milošević visited a municipal office and spoke to a crowd of unhappy Serbs who had gathered outside. Milošević was uncertain as he addressed them, but everything changed when he voiced a nationalist message they had never heard before: “No one will be allowed to beat the Serbs again, no one!” he said.

    The crowd began to chant his name. Even though he remained cold (he had almost no charisma), it was a decisive moment in which he realized the political usefulness of tapping into the resentments of Serbs who felt slighted by other identity groups in Yugoslavia. This had been a taboo, and he broke it. When Milošević returned to Belgrade, he took up the banner of Serb nationalism and ousted his low-energy mentor, Ivan Stambolić. He provoked other republics to secede from Yugoslavia, and this led to years of warfare and war crimes.

    This is the bit, however—to hear why, listen to Sebastian Gorka own Marco Werman on yesterday’s The World—in Maass’ piece that gave me chills:

    Milošević created his own reality. I have never interviewed Trump but I have an unforgettable memory of what it’s like to sit in a room with a gaslighter-in-chief and try to pin him down. I was one of the few American journalists whom Milošević spoke with before he was overthrown and extradited to a war crimes trial in The Hague, where he died of a heart attack in 2006.

    Milošević was shameless in lying about obvious truths. “We are blamed for a nationalistic policy but I don’t believe that our policy is nationalistic,” he said. “If we don’t have national equality and equality of people, we cannot be, how to say, a civilized and prosperous country in the future.” As we spoke, the military forces he had organized were continuing to lay waste to Bosnia, encircling Sarajevo and other major cities with medieval-style sieges.

    We sat together for 90 minutes, with nobody else in the room. Though he didn’t have the bluster of Trump—Milošević was a quiet and controlled speaker, with just occasional flashes of anger that were tactical, not impulsive—he was a master of the alternative fact, even in the face of someone who knew they were lies, because I had reported from Bosnia on the crimes perpetrated by military forces under his control. When I later wrote a book about all this, I described Miloševi?’s relationship to the truth in a way that I now realize fits Trump, too.

    I would have had better luck trying to land a punch on a hologram. Milošević existed in a different dimension, a twilight zone of lies, and I was mucking about in the dimension of facts. He had spent his entire life in the world of communism, and he had become a master, an absolute master, at fabrication. Of course my verbal punches went right through him. It was as though I pointed to a black wall and asked Milošević what color it was. White, he says. No, I reply, look at it, that wall there, it is black, it is five feet away from us. He looks at it, then at me, and says, The wall is white, my friend, maybe you should have your eyes checked. He does not shout in anger. He sounds concerned for my eyesight. I knew the wall was black. I could see the wall. I had touched the wall. I had watched the workmen paint it black.

    Comparisons of political leaders are of limited usefulness, because no two are exactly alike—they bring to mind Tolstoy’s line about unhappy families, each is unhappy in its own way. Milošević was whip smart, disciplined, and he wasn’t a narcissist in the way of Trump. He didn’t have a lot of public meetings, his face wasn’t plastered on Serbian media, and he spent most evenings at home with his wife, a hard-line professor named Mira Milošević who was also his principal confidante. And no matter what Trump does, I don’t believe the United States is heading for the kind of violence that Milošević knowingly steered Yugoslavia toward.

    Yes. Lewis was wrong in 1935. Fascism did not come to The United States of America (though there were those like Charles Lindbergh who thought we ought to stay neutral or even side with Nazi Germany in the World War); it didn’t happen here. Then.

    Now? I don’t think we can afford to wait and see.

    8 February 2017

    REPUBLICANS SILENCE SENATOR FOR REAL TRUTH…

    0300 by Jeff Hess

    David Smith, writing in Jeff Sessions: uproar as Republicans exploit procedure to silence Elizabeth Warren for The Guardian, explains:

    Senate Republicans voted on Tuesday night to silence Elizabeth Warren for reading out a letter from the widow of Martin Luther King during a debate over Senator Jeff Sessions’ nomination for attorney general, eliciting furious response from Democrats.

    Speaking on the Senate floor, Warren quoted from 30-year-old correspondence from Coretta Scott King relating to Sessions’ failed judicial nomination in the 1980s. It was part of a barnstorming speech by the Massachusetts Senator against Sessions’ suitability for the post and attacking his record on civil rights.

    Mitch McConnell, the Republican majority leader, objected that Warren had broken Senate rules that prohibit one member impugning the conduct of another. Senators then voted 49-43 to uphold a ruling in McConnell’s favour.

    Shame! Shame! Shame!

    Here’s what Coretta Scott King wrote in 1980:

    Dear Senator Thurmond:

    I write to express my sincere opposition to the confirmation of Jefferson B. Sessions as a federal district court judge for the Southern District of Alabama. My professional and personal roots in Alabama are deep and lasting. Anyone who has used the power of his office as United States Attorney to intimidate and chill the free exercise of the ballot by citizens should not be elevated to our courts. Mr. Sessions has used the awesome powers of his office in a shabby attempt to intimidate and frighten elderly black voters. For this reprehensible conduct, he should not be rewarded with a federal judgeship.

    I regret that a long-standing commitment prevents me from appearing in person to testify against this nominee. However, I have attached a copy of my statement opposing Mr. Sessions’ confirmation and I request that my statement as well as this be made a part of the hearing record.

    I do sincerely urge you to oppose the confirmation of Mr. Sessions.

    Sincerely,

    Coretta Scott King

    Again: Shame! Shame! Shame!

    7 February 2017

    CALL SENATOR ROB PORTMAN THIS MORNING…

    0600 by Jeff Hess

    Billionaire and educational lightweight, Betsy DeVos faces a split senate and the near certainty that only the tie-breakeing vote of Vice President Mike Pence can seat her as the Secretary of Education, a post she is most certainly not qualified for.

    From Our Revolution:

    Last week, you made over 10,000 calls and logged 40,000 minutes on the phones asking Senators to use the full 30 hours of debate time in opposition to Trump’s unqualified cabinet nominees—and they listened.

    Right now, Senate Democrats are holding the floor for 24 hours and all through the night to oppose Betsy DeVos’ confirmation to Secretary of Education.The vote count in the Senate currently stands at a 50/50 tie.

    You could make the call that changes the vote on our next Secretary of Education. Will you call your senators and encourage them to vote against the confirmation of Betsy DeVos? The Republicans cannot afford another defection, and we cannot afford Betsy DeVos.

    If you believe in quality education for all people and rejecting big money influence in politics, this is your chance to make your voice heard and impact Continue Reading »

    « Previous - Next »