5 October 2015

MYTH BUSTING THE FIREWATER FAIRY TALE…

0700 by Jeff Hess

I first heard the myth of Native Americans having no natural resistance to alcohol when I was a senior in high school; and I heard the story from a Vietnam veteran and former Marine who was also an Indian (I use that term advisedly, having spoken with Dennis Banks once). To my uneducated mind, the source was impeccable. Who was I to question someone who had lived reality.

The problem was, of course, that my friend was so deep into the story that he didn’t question the source of the alcoholism he had grown up with all around him.

More than 40 years later, I’m finally getting an education on the topic from Maia Szalavitz writing in No, Native Americans aren’t genetically more susceptible to alcoholism for the Economic Hardship Reporting Project.

When Jessica Elm, a citizen of the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, was studying for her master’s degree in social work, she frequently heard about how genes were responsible for the high risk of alcoholism among American Indians. But her own family’s experience — and the research, she discovered — tells a very different story.

The “firewater” fairytale that Elm came to know all too well goes like this: Europeans introduced Native Americans to alcohol, which they were genetically unprepared to handle. That happenstance led to alcoholism rates that are around twice as high as those seen in whites — and alcohol-related death rates, which are at least tripled. In this view, colonization didn’t make conquered people susceptible to heavy drinking — genes did.

Addiction is often described as an equal opportunity disease. It isn’t: while anyone can become addicted under certain conditions, like most bullies, addiction prefers to hit people who are already hurting. The more trauma and social exclusion a child experiences, the greater the addiction risk. This creates a vicious cycle: addiction itself becomes a reason for even more rejection, prejudice, and maltreatment.

Perhaps nowhere is this clearer than in the shameful collection of stereotypes and stigmas surrounding alcoholism among American Indians. “Firewater” myths come from the racist ideology that fueled colonialism…

Reading this made me think of the front-page story in my local weekly which talks about the ravages of heroin addiction, but nowhere in the story does the economic reality in North Eastern Ohio get mentioned.

Attack the cause—unemployment, abuse, helplessness—not the symptom or even those selling the escape

5 October 2015

FROM CENTURIAL SANDY TO MILLENNIAL JOAQUIN…

0600 by Jeff Hess

Until now the discussions in severe weather stories has been about once-a-century, centurial, events. Hurricane Joaquin, a storm that didn’t even come ashore in the United States, has given Americans a whole new standard to wrap their heads around: the millennial event.

Martin Pengelly, writing in Eight dead as South Carolina hit by ‘once in a millennium’ floods for The Guardian, quotes South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley:

This is the worst flooding in the low country [the region around the South Carolina coast] for a thousand years, that’s how big this is.That’s what South Carolina is dealing with right now.

What does a millennial flood look like?

A “once-in-a-millennium” downpour has flooded large parts of South Carolina, causing at least seven deaths.

The storm had dumped more than 18 inches (45 cm) of rain in parts of central South Carolina by early Sunday. The state climatologist forecast another 2 to 6 inches (5 to 15 cm) through Monday as the rainfall began to slacken.

The state’s governor, Nikki Haley, said parts of the state were hit with rainfall that would be expected to occur once in 1,000 years, with the Congaree river running at its highest level since 1936.

Pengelly makes a critical observation in his conclusion:

Haley’s reference to the flooding being the “worst in a thousand years” did not mean that South Carolina, which became a colony in 1663 and a state in 1788, had not seen such flooding since 1015 AD.

The reference was to the expectation among forecasters that in any given 1,000 years, such flooding could reasonably be expected to occur only once.

Pengelly might have added, as I do here, that such events may no longer be expected to occur once a millennium, but, given rising planetary temperatures, we must be prepared to respond to multiples of such disasters and take immediate actions to reduce the carbon emissions responsible before we all drown.

5 October 2015

KEEP CARBON IN THE GROUND: TAKE II…

0500 by Jeff Hess

The Guardian emails:

Dear Jeff,

With eight weeks until the doors of the decade’s most important climate change conference open in Paris, it has never been more important to make our voices heard.

That’s why today the Guardian is launching the second phase of our Keep it in the Ground campaign.

You—the supporters of this campaign—have been its backbone since the beginning. So we asked you where to take it next and your responses can be summarised in one word: hope.

We aren’t abandoning fossil fuel divestment but we will now focus on solar power: the alternatives, the positive stories and its amazing growth and potential.

Read our plans for the next stage here. Show you’re still committed to the campaign and help spread the word below.

One reader, Steven Griffiths, a carer from Carmarthenshire, Wales, told us: “I hope you’ll prompt a rethink…and start something that they won’t be able to stop.”

We hope so too—but we can’t do it without you. We’ll be in touch in the next few days to ask for your further input but in the meantime.

You can also email me. We’ve also updated the campaign FAQ.

Yours sincerely,

James Randerson
Assistant national news editor

Keep Carbon In The Ground…

5 October 2015

NAOMI KLEIN ON STEALING THE SKY…

0400 by Jeff Hess

The biggest problem with these arguments [—that the goal should be to get the cheapest possible products to the consumer so that the green transition can happens as quickly as possible—] is the notion that there is any free market in energy to be protected from distortion. Not only do fossil fuel companies receive $775 billion in annual global subsidies, but they pay nothing for the privilege of treating our shared atmosphere as a free waste dump—a fact that has been described by the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change as “the greatest market failure the world has ever seen.” The freebie is the real distortion, that theft of the sky the real subsidy. p. 70

From This Changes Everything: Capitalism Vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein

Previously…

Found in my electronic chapbook.

4 October 2015

ROLDO RIGHTS ON OUR SAD, SAD CLEVELAND
ALL DRESSED IN THE FINEST RED AND GREEN…

1600 by Jeff Hess

roldo waterfront line 151004

The city may be drowning in blood. But our downtown still floats on green.

Green as in cash. No expense spared.

Last week the Plain Dealer reported that the Public Square redo (I should say “iconic” redo, as PD Steve Litt calls it; but he calls almost everything he writes about “iconic”) was $5 million short. The Greater Cleveland Partnership, which runs the portion of Cleveland called “downtown”, wants the state legislature to “tuck” in $3.5 into the iconic needs of the Square.

I hate to say I told you but I did. In February:

Why don’t we know the costs of Public Square for example? It’s said to be $30 to $32.5 million. But that doesn’t really add up.

If you believe the PD both the city and county have pledged $10 million each, that’s $20 million; the Regional Sewer District $3 million, that’s $23 million; the Cleveland Foundation, $8 million, that’s $31 million; the Gund Foundation $5 million, that’s $36 million; the Kent Smith Foundation (you know the corporates are behind this when foundation money pours out) $1 million, that $37 million.

But it doesn’t stop there. Oh, no.

More public money will be flushed in over time.

Because the property taxes from the Higbee-Horseshoe Casino building, which supposedly might help finance police and firefighters and more, won’t go to the county and city, as it should. No this tax revenue will be diverted to the Square project too. Who knows how much over time? One price tag has it at $18 million.

So the $37 million plus the $18 million suggests to me that the cost will be $55 million.

That doesn’t include a lot of infrastructure costs that will have to be done, especially for RTA as it has to divert its buses to make space for the next Public Square.

The $18 million results in a tax incremental financing deal via the city.

The loss of that $18 million in property tax revenue will have to be Continue Reading »

4 October 2015

ROBERT REICH ON BERNIE SANDERS…

0800 by Jeff Hess

The only alumnus of the Clinton Administration that I respect is Robert Reich. I continue to read his blog and have read his books. On Thursday, Reich came to Bernie’s defense after David Fahrenthold’s attack in The Washington Post. Reich begins:

The Washington Post just ran an attack on Bernie Sanders that distorts not only what he’s saying and seeking but also the basic choices that lie before the nation. Sanders, writes the Post’s David Fahrenthold, “is not just a big-spending liberal. And his agenda is not just about money. It’s also about control.”

Fahrenthold claims Sanders’s plan for paying for college with a tax on Wall Street trades would mean “colleges would run by government rules.”

Apparently Fahrenthold is unaware that three-quarters of college students today attend public universities financed largely by state governments. And even those who attend elite private universities benefit from federal tax subsidies flowing to wealthy donors. (Meg Whitman’s recent $30 million donation to Princeton, for example, is really $20 million from her plus an estimated $10 million she deducted from her taxable income.) Notwithstanding all this government largesse, colleges aren’t “run by government rules.”

The real problem is too many young people still can’t afford a college education.

Big money students get lots of tax-payer supported aid from big money universities. Those not tapped into the 1 percent? Not so much. Reich continues:

The move toward free public higher education that began in the 1950s with the G.I. Bill and was extended in the 1960s by leading public universities was reversed starting in the 1980s because of shrinking state budgets. Tuition has skyrocketed in recent years as states slashed education spending. It’s time to resurrect that earlier goal.

Besides, the biggest threats to academic freedom these days aren’t coming from government. They’re coming as conditions attached to funding from billionaires and big corporations that’s increasing as public funding drops.

When the Charles Koch Foundation pledged $1.5 million to Florida State University’s economics department, for example, it stipulated that a Koch-appointed advisory committee would select professors and undertake annual evaluations. The Koch brothers now fund 350 programs at over 250 colleges and universities across America. You can bet that funding doesn’t underwrite research on inequality and environmental justice.

I’d take that bet.

This is not the first time Reich has supported Bernie

3 October 2015

BERNIE ON GUNS, VIOLENCE AND POLICE…

1200 by Jeff Hess

Alan Yuhas, writing in Bernie Sanders thrills Boston with call to fight racism and reform gun law for The Guardian, reports:

Bernie Sanders decried “an institutional racism that allows and continues to allow unarmed African Americans to be killed by police” on Saturday night, as he preached to a huge crowd in Boston that welcomed the Democratic presidential candidate’s now familiar vision of “political revolution”.

Sanders alluded to a string of high-profile police killings of unarmed black people, and to a subsequent series of grand jury decisions not to indict officers involved in some cases.

“It is not easy being a cop today,” Sanders told the crowd. “Many of them are underpaid, their schedules are terrible, and their family life is very stressful.

“But like any other public official when a police officer breaks the law that officer must be held accountable.”

No one, especially those entrusted to enforce laws, must be above The Law.

3 October 2015

IN THE U.S.—994 MASS SHOOTINGS IN 1,004 DAYS…

0800 by Jeff Hess

mass shootings

The Oregon school shooting is evidence that the US response to gun violence ‘has become routine’, Barack Obama says. The data compiled by the crowd-sourced site Mass Shooting Tracker reveals an even more shocking human toll: there is a mass shooting—defined as four or more people shot in one incident—nearly every day. —The Guardian.

30 September 2015

ROLDO RIGHTS, HOLDS A MIRROR UP TO THE PD

1600 by Jeff Hess

frank jackson 150930

Hasn’t the time come for the Plain Dealer to start asking the tough questions of Mayor Frank Jackson? Really tough questions.

The guy the paper has told us to vote for to keep in office.

Columnist Mark Naymik groused that City Council hasn’t been putting the pressure on Jackson. They’re boring. Does he read his paper?

Naymik, a former colleague at the old Free Times, should know that the politicians get unruly when they see they can get ink. In other words, they’ll get hot when the paper gives them encouragement.

I’ve noticed no attempt to build up an opponent for Jackson.

The Plain Dealer long has not given Mayor Frank Jackson the kind of kick in the butt he so richly deserves.

He has been the worse mayor in the last 50 years of my experience.

Yet, the PD—unfortunately, the main source of civic information available—allows him to continue his “it is what it is” nonsensical form of governing. So it never will change. There is no “It is NOT what it should be.”

I last noted Jackson’s lack of concern about the shooting deaths of two children. He got up enough emotion to call them “innocents.”

He has shown no leadership with the police force. Indeed, the opposite.

His inaction at every level is mind-boggling, from the water department to now the airport as one after another debacle becomes public.

Yes, the PD reports these but never seems to have anyone—including Naymik—who adds them up and says, “Hey, what’s going on here.”

It is clear that Jackson never punishes anyone who does badly so why worry, as a city employee, about not doing your job? Nothing is going to happen because “it is what it is.”

And you keep hearing from various private outlets that Jackson feels he should run again. Is this true?

Jackson even fakes his State of the City addresses. He has invented the lazy way to do this, seemingly acceptable to the newspaper, the City Club and certainly the powers that be in town. (They get what they want). Ask me some questions, he says, then answers them with the same “it is what it is” nonsense, usually repeating at least twice his words.

Poverty goes up. Population goes down. Murders go up. The state of children’s health goes down. Police infractions go up. So do city payments to those abused.

Jackson himself rates Jackson poorly. I wrote some time ago:

“Sadly, not that much has changed in 50 years,” said Mayor Frank Jackson, the city’s third black mayor. “We are still addressing aging infrastructure, poverty and issues on the police department.

Actually, a lot has changed.

As Jackson also noted, “You can look at the skyline and see new stadiums and building everywhere, but what you don’t see is the 40-year-old pipeline.” Or, I might add again, the impoverished neighborhoods where little changes.”

Naymik is right about one thing. Someone should be sounding the alarm.

He works for the first and foremost outlet that should clearly let its voice be heard.

We have a mayor who needs to GO!

It’s time citizens should be marching on city hall.

By Roldo Bartimole…

29 September 2015

PROFIT FROM SLAVERY IS ILL-GOTTEN GAIN…

0700 by Jeff Hess

MacArthur fellow genius Ta-Nehisi Coates set the bar for the discussion of reparations in 2014 when The Atlantic published his cover story: The Case for Reparations.

On the eve of his first official visit to former British colony Jamaica, British Prime Minister David Cameron faces calls for his government to pay billion in reparations to the Caribean nation.

Rowena Mason, writing in Jamaica calls for Britain to pay billions of pounds in reparations for slavery for The Guardian, reports:

David Cameron is facing calls for Britain to pay billions of pounds in reparations for slavery ahead of his first official visit to Jamaica on Tuesday.

Downing Street said the prime minister does not believe reparations or apologies for slavery are the right approach, but the issue is set to overshadow his trade trip to the island, where he will address the Jamaican parliament.

Ahead of his trip, Sir Hilary Beckles, chair of the Caricom Reparations Commission, has led calls for Cameron to start talks on making amends for slavery and referenced the prime minister’s ancestral links to the trade in the 1700s through his cousin six times removed, General Sir James Duff.

In an open letter in the Jamaica Observer, the academic wrote: “You are a grandson of the Jamaican soil who has been privileged and enriched by your forebears’ sins of the enslavement of our ancestors … You are, Sir, a prized product of this land and the bonanza benefits reaped by your family and inherited by you continue to bind us together like birds of a feather.

“We ask not for handouts or any such acts of indecent submission. We merely ask that you acknowledge responsibility for your share of this situation and move to contribute in a joint programme of rehabilitation and renewal. The continuing suffering of our people, Sir, is as much your nation’s duty to alleviate as it is ours to resolve in steadfast acts of self-responsibility.”

We have no problem in the United States with seizing ill-gotten profits. I know the question is far more complicated than I state here, but how is demanding reparations from slavery morally any different?

29 September 2015

THE IMPORTANCE OF NECESSARY TROUBLE

0600 by Jeff Hess

Senator Ted Kennedy served the people of Massachusetts for nearly half a century. He also served the people of the United States and the world. After a thankfully brief flirtation with Republican Scott Brown, voters in Massachusetts found a worthy successor to Kennedy in Elizabeth Warren.

Sunday Senator Warren spoke at the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate in Boston. At the core of her speech was the message of 2015: Black Lives Matter.

Fifty years [after the 1950s/1960s civil rights struggle], violence against African Americans has not disappeared. Consider law enforcement. The vast majority of police officers sign up so they can protect their communities. They are part of an honorable profession that takes risks every day to keep us safe. We know that. But we also know—and say—the names of those whose lives have been treated with callous indifference. Sandra Bland. Freddie Gray. Michael Brown. We’ve seen sickening videos of unarmed, black Americans cut down by bullets, choked to death while gasping for air – their lives ended by those who are sworn to protect them. Peaceful, unarmed protestors have been beaten. Journalists have been jailed. And, in some cities, white vigilantes with weapons freely walk the streets. And it’s not just about law enforcement either. Just look to the terrorism this summer at Emanuel AME Church. We must be honest: Fifty years after John Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. spoke out, violence against African Americans has not disappeared.

And what about voting rights? Two years ago, five conservative justices on the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, opening the floodgates ever wider for measures designed to suppress minority voting. Today, the specific tools of oppression have changed-voter ID laws, racial gerrymandering, and mass disfranchisement through a criminal justice system that disproportionately incarcerates black citizens. The tools have changed, but black voters are still deliberately cut out of the political process.

Violence. Voting. And what about economic injustice? Research shows that the legal changes in the civil rights era created new employment and housing opportunities. In the 1960s and the 1970s, African-American men and women began to close the wage gap with white workers, giving millions of black families hope that they might build real wealth.

But then, Republicans’ trickle-down economic theory arrived. Just as this country was taking the first steps toward economic justice, the Republicans pushed a theory that meant helping the richest people and the most powerful corporations get richer and more powerful. I’ll just do one statistic on this: From 1980 to 2012, GDP continued to rise, but how much of the income growth went to the 90 percent of America—everyone outside the top 10 percent—black, white, Latino? None. Zero. Nothing. 100 percent of all the new income produced in this country over the past 30 years has gone to the top ten percent.

Today, 90 percent of Americans see no real wage growth. For African-Americans, who were so far behind earlier in the 20th Century, this means that since the 1980s they have been hit particularly hard. In January of this year, African-American unemployment was 10.3 percent—more than twice the rate of white unemployment. And, after beginning to make progress during the civil rights era to close the wealth gap between black and white families, in the 1980s the wealth gap exploded, so that from 1984 to 2009, the wealth gap between black and white families tripled.

The remedy for these racial and economic injustices lies in the vote. This, repeats Warren, is the reason Republicans are so focused on narrowing the franchise and preventing another 2008 catastrophe for those who falsely believe that our country is a White, Christian nation.

Two years ago the Supreme Court eviscerated critical parts of the Voting Rights Act. Congress could easily fix this, and Democrats in the Senate have called for restoration of voting rights. Now it is time for Republicans to step up to support a restoration of the Voting Rights Act—or to stand before the American people and explain why they have abandoned America’s most cherished liberty, the right to vote.

And while we’re at it, we need to update the rules around voting. Voting should be simple. Voter registration should be automatic. Get a driver’s license, get registered automatically. Nonviolent, law-abiding citizens should not lose the right to vote because of a prior conviction. Election Day should be a holiday, so no one has to choose between a paycheck and a vote. Early voting and vote by mail would give fast food and retail workers who don’t get holidays day off a chance to proudly cast their votes. The hidden discrimination that comes with purging voter rolls and short-staffing polling places must stop. The right to vote remains essential to protect all other rights, and no candidate for president or for any other elected office—Republican or Democrat—should be elected if they will not pledge to support full, meaningful voting rights.

Republicans no more want want a free and informed electorate than court-room attorneys want a fair and impartial jury. We the people, however, require free and informed voters because without them the game is rigged.

Warren concluded this way:

Back in March, I met an elderly man at the First Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama. We were having coffee and donuts in the church basement before the service started. He told me that more than 50 years earlier—in May of 1961—he had spent 11 hours in that same basement, along with hundreds of people, while a mob outside threatened to burn down the church because it was a sanctuary for civil rights workers. Dr. King called Attorney General Bobby Kennedy, desperately asking for help. The Attorney General promised to send the Army, but the closest military base was several hours away. So the members of the church and the civil rights workers waited in the sweltering basement, crowded together, listening to the mob outside and hoping the U.S. Army would arrive in time.

After the church service, I asked Congressman John Lewis about that night. He had been right there in that church back in 1961 while the mob gathered outside. He had been in the room during the calls to the Attorney General. I asked if he had been afraid that the Army wouldn’t make it in time. He said that he was “never, ever afraid. You come to that point where you lose all sense of fear.” And then he said something I’ll never forget. He said that his parents didn’t want him to get involved in civil rights. They didn’t want him to “cause trouble.” But he had done it anyway. He told me: “Sometimes it is important to cause necessary trouble.”

The first civil rights battles were hard fought. But they established that Black Lives Matter. That Black Citizens Matter. That Black Families Matter. Half a century later, we have made real progress, but we have not made ENOUGH progress. As Senator Kennedy said in his first floor speech, “This is not a political issue. It is a moral issue, to be resolved through political means.” So it comes to us to continue the fight, to make, as John Lewis said, the “necessary trouble” until we can truly say that in America, every citizen enjoys the conditions of freedom.

In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Dr. King wrote: We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that “justice too long delayed is justice denied.”

We need to stop the delays here.

29 September 2015

NAOMI KLEIN ON LEFT AND RIGHT TOGETHER…

0500 by Jeff Hess

As for pitching climate action as a way to protect America’s high-consumerist way of life—that is either dishonest or delusional because a way of life based on the promise of infinite growth cannot be protected, least of all exported to every corner of the globe. p. 58

[W]hat the moderates constantly trying to reframe as something more palatable are really asking is this: How can we create change so that the people responsible for the crisis do not feel threatened by the solution? How, they ask, do you reassure members of a panicked megalomaniacal elite that they are still masters of the universe, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary?

The answer is: you don’t. You make sure you have enough people on your side to change the balance of power and take on those responsible knowing that true populist movements always draw from both the left and the right. And rather than twisting yourself into knots trying to appease a lethal worldview, you set out to deliberately strengthen those values (egalitarian and communitarian as the cultural cognition studies cited here describe them) that are currently being vindicated, rather than refuted by the laws of nature. p. 58

From This Changes Everything: Capitalism Vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein

Previously…

Found in my electronic chapbook.

29 September 2015

HOW TO CURE EMBRACE BOREDOM…

0400 by Jeff Hess

I can’t remember a time in my life when I was bored. Boredom is simply not a concept I emotionally understand. Yet, hardly a school day passes when I do not hear one of my students lament some permutation of the phrase: I’m so bored. Gayatri Devi, writing in Boredom is not a problem to be solved. It’s the last privilege of a free mind for The Guardian, can relate:

I live and teach in small-town Pennsylvania, and some of my students from bigger cities tell me that they always go home on Fridays because they are bored here.

You know the best antidote to boredom, I asked them? They looked at me expectantly, smartphones dangling from their hands. Think, I told them. Thinking is the best antidote to boredom. I am not kidding, kids. Thinking is the best antidote to boredom. Tell yourself, I am bored. Think about that. Isn’t that interesting? They looked at me incredulously. Thinking is not how they were brought up to handle boredom.

The last thing many students want to do is think. They want to be entertained. Entertainment, however, only masks the problem. Devi recommends instead that students:

So lean in to boredom, into that intense experience of time untouched by beauty, pleasure, comfort and all other temporal salubrious sensations. Observe it, how your mind responds to boredom, what you feel and think when you get bored. This form of metathinking can help you overcome your boredom, and learn about yourself and the world in the process. If meditating on nothing is too hard at the outset, at the very least you can imitate William Wordsworth and let that host of golden daffodils flash upon your inward eye: emotions recollected in tranquility—that is, reflection—can fill empty hours while teaching you, slowly, how to sit and just be in the present.

Blaise Pascal nailed the problem when he wrote (as Oliver Burkeman echoed earlier this year): All of humanity’s problems stem from man’s inability to sit quietly in a room alone.

28 September 2015

SHELL STEPS BACK FROM LIGHTING THE FUSE…

1200 by Jeff Hess

The Guardian emails:

Dear Jeff,

I wanted to let you know about an amazing result for the environment movement. Following port blockades by kayaktivists, protests outside corporate headquarters, and millions of people expressing their objection online, Shell have finally backed down from plans to drill in the sea off Alaska. The move is a huge climb-down for the company which has spent around $7bn on the venture and it means that the fuse on the Arctic carbon bomb stays unlit (for now).

What this shows us is that in a David and Goliath fight, people power can have an impact. Privately, the company admits they have been taken aback by the scale of protests against their moves in the Arctic.

In the next few days we’ll be in touch because once again we need your help. The Keep it in the Ground team have been working on the next phase of the campaign and we are now just days away from launching.

Yours sincerely,

James Randerson
Assistant national news editor

Keep Carbon In The Ground…

28 September 2015

ELIZABETH WARREN: THE GAME IS RIGGED

0430 by Jeff Hess

I continue to believe, regardless of how awesome Elizabeth Warren is, that she will wield more power, bring about greater change, as a Senator than she might in the White House.

28 September 2015

NAOMI KLEIN AND THE RISE OF NEOLIBERALISM…

0400 by Jeff Hess

The Heritage Foundation is hawking reports, as are the Cato Institute and the Ayn Rand Institute. The climate denial movement—far from an organic convergence of skeptical scientists—is entirely a creature of the ideological network on display here, the very one that deserves the bulk of credit for redrawing the global ideological map over the last four decades. p. 38

Many of these institutions were created in the late. 1960s and early 1970s, when U.S. business elites feared that public opinion was turning dangerously against capitalism and toward, if not socialism, then an aggressive Keynesianism. In response, they launched a counterrevolution, a richly funded intellectual movement that argued that greed and the limited pursuit of profit was nothing to apologize for and offered the greatest hope for human emancipation that the world had ever known. Under this liberationist banner, they fought for such policies as tax cuts, free trade deals, for the auctioning off of core state assets from phones to energy to water—the package known in most of the world as neoliberalism. p. 38-9

From This Changes Everything: Capitalism Vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein

Previously…

Found in my electronic chapbook.

28 September 2015

MAKE ABNORMAL THE NEW NORMAL

0330 by Jeff Hess

tom peters 150928

27 September 2015

NAOMI KLEIN ON OUR CLIMATE DISSONANCE…

1600 by Jeff Hess

The evidence is striking. Among the segment of the U.S. population that displays the strongest hierarchical views, only 11 percent rate climate change as a high risk, compared with 69 percent of the segment displaying egalitarian views.

Yale law professor Dan Kahan, the lead author on this study, attributes the tight correlation between worldview and acceptance of climate science to cultural cognition, the process by which all of us—regardless of political leanings—filter new information in ways that will protect our preferred vision of the good society. If new information seems to confirm that vision, we welcome it and integrate it easily. If it poses a threat to our belief system, then our brain immediately gets to work producing intellectual antibodies designed to repel the unwelcome invasion. p. 36-7

They deny reality, in other words, because the implications of that reality are, quite simply, unthinkable. p. 43

The bottom line is that we are all inclined to denial when the truth is too costly—whether emotionally, intellectually or financially. As Upton Sinclair famously observed: It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. p. 46

From This Changes Everything: Capitalism Vs. The Climate by Naomi Klein

Previously…

Found in my electronic chapbook.

27 September 2015

I’M THINKING A LOT ABOUT FEAR THIS MORNING…

0500 by Jeff Hess

zen pencisl fear

26 September 2015

WHAT IF HE’S NOT CLOSER TO GOD…?

0700 by Jeff Hess

Matt Taibbi writes in Why Do We Care Whose Side the Pope Is On? for Rolling Stone

People have such impassioned political fights over the pope because everyone wants the endorsement of the guy closest to God. But what if he’s not closer to God, and is just a guy in a funny hat? Doesn’t that make all this fuss and controversy ridiculous? It seems strange that it’s the year 2015, and we still can’t say that out loud.

I think the better question is why does anyone think there is a god to be closer to?

« Previous - Next »