So, Scott Adams has moved on to Climate Change/Global Warming discussions with The Non-Expert Problem and Climate Change Science and Watching the Climate Science Bubbles from the Outside. In each post I left comments requesting additional information:
I’ve seen equally credible-looking arguments that say it is bunk.
Having the list of those arguments would be tremendously helpful. Would you please post them?
Please list two or three of the “the strong versions of the argument on the other side” of the Climate Change for us to read in an upcoming post.
Have Coffee Will Write
Nothing but crickets in response to either comment.
Now, Adams is a busy man and he has his own agenda, but I think that what he’s doing here has deeper implications than just promoting his brand. Still, I continue to read his comics and his blog. Knowing the other is important to me, but I’m also grateful for Bill Nye.